Original Documents

The Start and the End of the 18th Dynasty

The Old Kingdom
The 12th Dynasty
Encyclopedia
EA Encyclopedia
Battle Scene Fragments
The Rise of the 18th Dynasty
Information of Amenhotep III
The Economy of the Levant
The Strange Ending of the 18th Dynasty
The Succession after Akhnaton
The End of the 18th Dynasty and Horemheb
Facts about Tiyi, Tut and Aye
The Love Poem
The Pit in the Rock Tomb
Comments
Bridging the 18th - 22nd Dynasty
Additional Discoveries
Balaam - A Christian Reflection & 2009
Notes & References
El Amarna's Mesos
The 22nd Dynasty
The Intermediate Period
The Thutmosides
The 19th Dynasty

At the end of the 480 year period Ahmose, son of Ebana, had come up, and with the aid of Saul and later David, battled the Hyksos/Amalekites at various Palestinian locations and finally conquered their stronghold of Auaris. However, the capture of Avaris, according to scripture, was a long drawn out siege for the defenders had ample space and supplies to last them through such an event. Nevertheless, at some point Apopi, their king, had sent word by camel messenger to the Prince of Kush to persuade him to attack Egypt from the south.

"Come, fare north at once, do not be timid. See he (Kamose) is here with me ... I will not let him go until you have arrived. Then we will divide the towns of this Egypt between us." [100]

But the messenger was caught by loyal troops to Kamose and the plan was never carried out.

Conventional historians apparently are ignoring Arabic sources on the history of Avaris [200] which was also known as Auaris, Tharu and Rhinocorura. The builders name was Latis as he is called in the Arabic sources. We believe Latis is identical with the Hyksos king Salitis of Josephus-Manetho. [300]

Saul had gathered over 200,000 footmen and 10,000 men of Judah. He besieged Sharuhen for 6 years [400]. From the Egyptian sources the Ahmose Inscription[500] sheds some light on this conflict. This is how these people came to their end as anyone can read in the scriptures allowing the native ruler Ahmose to become the first king of the 18th dynasty.

Battle Scene Fragments

In 1993 battle scene fragments of the time of Ahmose were found on the eastern side of the inner court at Abydos. One fragment of a monumental stele shows two hieroglyphs spelling the name of the Hyksos capital Avaris (Hut-waret); a group of three archers aim upward - perhaps at the Hyksos fortress; teams of bridled chariot horses; ships with oars descending into water; fallen men recognizable as Asiatic soldiers; Hyksos subjects recognizable by their characteristic fringed garments and long swords; an inscription fragment showing part of the name of king Apophis (Egyptian - Ipep, Hebrew Apop/Agog); and a grain harvest relief may show an event during the siege, perhaps in response to their looting invasions?

"I followed the king on foot when he rode abroad in his chariot. One besieged the city of Avaris (Auaris). I showed valor on foot before his majesty ... One fought on the water in the canal [riverbed] of Avaris. ... Then there was again fighting in this place; I again fought. ... One gave to me the gold of bravery ... One fought in this Egypt, south of this city; then brought away a living captive. ... One captured Avaris. ... One besieged Sharuhen [s-r-h-n] for six years[600] [and] his majesty took it... One gave me the gold of bravery, besides giving me the captives for slaves ..." [700]

And in the parallel text in the scriptures we read"

"And Saul came to [the] city of Amalek, and laid wait in [the bed of] the stream [nakhal]."[800] 1.Samuel 15:5.

These words, "city of Amalek" have always been a stumbling block for commentators. The Amalekites are supposed to have been a small tribe of unsettled Bedouins but it makes sense once we realize they were the Hyksos.

El-Arish is the only river between the Nile Delta and Palestine which the Scriptures persistently refer to as `nakhal'. In winter it can be a torrent, in summer it is dry.

See Numbers 34:5; Joshua 15:4; Joshua 15:47; 2.Kings 24:7.

From the scriptural viewpoint God had charged Israel:

"Remember what Amalek did unto thee by the way, when ye were come forth out of Egypt ... Thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it." Exodus 17:14,16; Deuteronomy 25:17-19.

The war ended with Saul sparing Agog and the best of the sheep, oxen and lambs and all that was good. The Prophet Samuel, in his capacity as the head lawyer of Israel, had instructed Saul not to spare anything because of the implication of a ban on inter-marriage with their women or those of their Egyptian subjects, whose overlords the Amalekites were. While men could marry their sister in Egypt, in Israel that was forbidden. As a result the two cultures had to collide eventually. [900]

Saul, after his great victory over the Amalekites, engaged himself in a war with the Philistines. He went into this war with a heavy heart (1.Samuel 16:14-18). The prophet Samuel had spoken stern words to him because he had shown kindness to Agog by sparing his life against the instructions of God (1.Sam. 15:3). Samuel killed Agog, never met Saul again, and died. Saul, with the aid of necromancy, tried to get in touch with the deceased Samuel. Again he disobeyed the explicit divine instructions not to consult the spirits of the devil. The day after his visit to the witch of Endor, Philistine archers hit Saul and he and his three sons died, Saul being finished off by his own request by an Amalekite soldier.

Historically the credit for freeing the Near East from the Hyksos yoke belongs to Saul, but his great achievement was never acknowledged and recognized and we shall find out why. Conventional authors usually apply "One" to the king himself. However, Saul was also a king. Nevertheless the minimal view would hold that Egyptians are unlikely to mention a foreign king while in the maximized view perhaps the ally situation may allow to include both kings in the account of Ahmose. [1000]

The strategic importance of El Arish can be gaged by the fact that here is where nearby Tharu had been constructed. According to excavation evidence this 3 meters thick, walled, enclosure covering 12,000 square meters, was an armory and dates back to the time of Seti the Great.

The capture of Auaris and the destruction of the Amalekites changed the course of history. Once more Egypt rose to power and splendor after being freed from hundreds of years of abject slavery and lack of freedom under a tyrannical people. The Age of the Exchanging of Gifts throughout the entire Orient reached new heights and became a hallmark of proper conduct among monarchs and potentates.

The Amalekites had revealed themselves as a wicked people who would have destroyed God's people and wiped out the worship of the only true God if given the opportunity. For this reason God commanded that nothing living of the Amalekites should survive but the Kenites [1050] because they were friendly towards Israel. We do not believe that the Qayini were the Kenites. [1.Samuel 15:6]

Ahmose's Links with Minoan Crete

The discovery of fragments of 18th Dynasty wall carving of the splendid, life sustaining attributes of a date palm tree. Felix v. Luschan, `Entstehung & Herkunft der Ionischen Säulen' in Der Alte Orient, Vol 13-15, 1912, p. 22.wall paintings in the destruction debries of M. Bietak's Tell el-Dab'a/Avaris, found laying over gardens beside the platform of a huge building (70m x 45m), which they are presumed to have decorated, seems to link Ahmose with the Minoan culture. The fragments show bulls and bull-leapers, a scene of an acrobat beside a palm tree, the pose of which is supposed to closely recall the scene of a chalcedony sealstone from Knossos and more images. [1100]

Careful reading reveals that the authors/editors use circular reasoning in that they try to corroberate dates between Minoan Crete, Mesopotamia and Egypt when both, the history of Crete and Mesopotamia, follow Egyptian chronological dating methods. An example is the clay sistrum, said to originate from the Middle Minoan IA funerary building 9 in the Arkhanes Phourni cemetery, compared to an example in blue faience from the pyramid of Amenemhat I at Lisht. The importance of this borrowing of Egyptian products on Crete implies "knowledge of the use and purpose of the Egyptian instrument; in other words we observe symbolic transfer taking place." [1150]

Here we have an example where the sistrum instrument was borrowed by the Minoans from the Egyptians while many other discoveries seem to indicate Egyptians borrowing or using ideas and products from Crete. Such bi-directional exchanges are normal and may corroborate but do not fix a chronology. See Here for more.

Chronological Contacts according to Conventional Dating
Cretan PrePalacial EB Age Early Dynastic, OK, FIP: (3000-1900)
Minoan/Cretan Palace Period: MMIB - LMIB MK to Thutmose III: (1900-1425)
Mycanean Period: Mycenaean Knossos & Aegean Amenophis III: (14th - 13th centuries)

Chronological Contacts according to Revised Dating
Cretan PrePalacial EB Age Early Dynastic to OK/MK: (ca. 2000-1450) (EBII-EBIII)
Minoan/Cretan Palace Period: MMIB - LMIB MK to Thutmose III: (ca. 1550-900)
Mycanean Period: Mycenaean Knossos & Aegean Amenophis III: (9th - 8th centuries)

The Rise of the 18th Dynasty

When Israel was at its highest point in its economic achievements under king Solomon, Egypt also was becoming very prosperous and had good relations with the Israelite king, so much so, that Solomon married pharaoh's daughter.[1300] Solomon also had two high Egyptian officials judging by their names, Eli-horeph and Ahiah, sons of Shisha, who were scribes (1.Kings 4:3). This indicates that the relations with Egypt in the days of Solomon and probably also Saul and David were much more complex and Egypt oriented than we might expect. In fact we may state that by virtue of Solomon having married the daughter of Thutmoses II, who had gone out of his way to destroy the remaining Canaanite stronghold of Gezer as a wedding gift (1.Kings 9:16), that he had great influence in Egypt. We may also consider Solomon resorting to forced labor, a common practice in Egypt, as an indication of his affinity with Egypt. The stern method of taxation under Hatshepsut in Egypt, Solomon in Israel (1.Kings 9:21, 22; 10:28; 12:10,11), was first introduced under the Middle Kingdom (12th dynasty) under Joseph (Genesis 41:34,35). Some of what is represented today than as Canaanite culture in archaeology is Israelite culture in revised view. It is incongruous to state that the Canaanites had a more advanced culture than the Israelites during the time of the judges. The reason for that assertion is once again an offset Egyptian chronology. The power of the Canaanites was that they were supported by the Hyksos/Amu/Amalekites whose influence reached clear back to the Euphrates [1350]. When the Hyksos/Amalekites were destroyed it also largely broke the resistance of the Canaanites.
The somewhat strange fact that the kings of the 18th Dynasty ruled Egypt from Thebes, far to the south from the Nile Delta while the 12th Dynasty ruled from the Lower Egypt appears to be a result of the intervening centuries of Hyksos/Amalekite domination which may have had a stronger presence in the north causing the newly emerging 18th Dynasty rulers to make their home in the south. Other reasons may have been climatic and environmental changes which made Upper Egypt a more preferred location. At any rate this transition took place from the last native Egyptian rulers, before the foreign take over, and the renewed re-emergency of native rulers under Ahmose and his brother Khamose with the help of the `One'.

The Defeat of the Hyksos by Kamose

Here is a part of the account of a tablet found by L. Carnarvon in 1908 recounting the defeat of the Hyksos from the point of view of Kamose:

"I should like to know what purpose serves my strength, when one prince is in Avaris and another is in Kush, and I sit united with an `A`am (Asiatic) and a Negro - each man holding his slice of the Black Land - who share the land with me. I do not pass him(??) as far as Memphis, the water (?) of Egypt. Behold, he holds(?) Shmun, and no man rests, being wasted(?) through servitude(?) of the Setyu. I will grapple with him, that I may cleave his belly. My desire is to deliver Egypt, and to smite(?) the `A'amu." [1400]

Khamose then battled the enemy in the vicinity of Elephantine in the south of Egypt.[1500]

The Rise of Queenly Power

When Hatshepsut became queen over Egypt Solomon ruled in Israel. Hearing the stories of his fabulous wealth she could bear it no longer but decided to visit him.

The Economy of the Levant

A long recognized critical factor in chronological interdependencies about the ancient nations of the Levant is their economy. Since in our revision we bring together different personalities, national history and economic factors we should present some issues and how they differ from conventional views. Our first task is to present as many scriptural assertions bearing on this subject as we can find. We shall go back in time in doing so.

The Scriptural Accounts Non-Scriptural Sources
Probably the best known tradesman was Noah whose feat of constructing a giant floating ark must have required skills and tools we cannot appreciate without some more detailed thought. Apparently the ancients had no special difficulties in cutting down large trees and shaping various types of wood as they had no problems in shaping the hardest stones like granite and diorite. To suggest that such work could be done with just stone tools seems rather impossible. We suggest that metal tools were in use long before Noah's time and a Stone Age never existed except perhaps for peoples living on the fringes of civilization. Granted, these peripheral societies living away from city or cultural centers, were the large majority of the world population. We suggest that modern researchers presenting Stone Age cultures apart from Metal Ages introduce, in doing so, a skewed picture of antiquity which lives only in their books.

One of the great tradesmen of the distant past was Abraham. Donkey and Camel caravans were the merchants truck fleets of that age. They distributed their wares along the major travel routes from China to North Africa in all directions. Sometimes goods would reach exorbitant prices due to having changed hands so often. The story of the Queen of Sheba and Solomon and the merchant aspects of that visit show how the Egyptians and Israelites sought for ways to eliminate the high prices caused by middle men merchants by trading and selling direct. Shipping lanes were the competition for the caravans in a limited way [Egypt and Levant] for shipping also brought regions together [Egypt and Greece] which never could be reached by caravans.
This section needs still some updating but we intended to present some statements from extra-biblical, historical sources in this section, i.e. Herodotus, Homer.

For the latest on the Chronological Origin of the Thutmoside rulers click Here!

Dynastic Life and Times

Amenhotep III and his Queen Tiye [1600] were among the wealthiest, if not the wealthiest, of the Egyptian kings. Their life is written up in many books and need not be repeated here. This king is of interest, however, because of his connections to the Amarna Age and because of our latest discoveries. There is some evidence for Amenophis (prenomen Nebmaatre) to have visited Akhetaten, the capital of his son Akhnaton. It is based on a discussion of a, with a damaged text inscribed bowl, saying in effect that Nebmaatre was "in Akhetaton", according to F.J. Giles.[1650]


For the latest on Amenhotep III

A tomb (TT226) thought to belong to the time of Amenhotep III, Amenhotep III even though very damaged, had a title, 'Overseer of the Upbringing of the King's Sons', of Amunhotep III preserved. A still visible painting of the owner, seated on a chair, shows on his lap his four sons . The top half of the painting is destroyed but the bottom half is still preserved. TT226 is supposed to belong to one Hekareshu, royal scribe, Overseer of the royal nurses. [1700]



Akhnaton and Akhetaten

The central region for most of the 18th Dynasty kings was Thebes and Karnak. Akhenaten changed all this and moved his residential capital some 170 miles further north on the banks of the Nile. Here the `Royal Road' connected the central city with administrative buildings all the way up past `The Sun Temple' to `The North Palace', Akhnaton's consort's palace, and to `The Riverside Palace', his royal residence. One well known architectural characteristic was Akhnaton's `Window of Appearances'. He may even have been the first monarch to employ such a design. [1800] Akhnaton is also famous for his wives. His Queen was Nefertiti.[1825] The name of his secondary Queen was Kiya, possibly the mother of Tutankhamen. [1850]

Archaeologists also excavated and described splendid residences of the nobles of the city of Akhetaten. Among these is the ca. 2850 ft2 (265 m2) home of a vizier by the name of `Nakht', the compound of the sculptor Thutmose of El Amarna as well as a 27 room El Amarna mansion (ca. 5710 ft2), owner unknown. Artists drawings are included. [1900]

But the city was not to survive for very long as events unfolded causing many officials to locate their tombs elsewhere, away from Amarna, like near Saqqara. We are told, here the tomb of Raïay or Hatiay, the son of a gold smith, who became a top administrator of the treasury of the temples of Aten in the southern capital and in Memphis, was located. The art work inside reveals his devotion to Akhnaton/Amenophis III. While tombs of other personalities linked with Akhnaton had been damaged, Raïay's survived whatever changes brought Akhetaten down. His beautiful young wife Maïa (was she the wetnurse Maya?), was also provided space in the tomb. But neither was found to be buried in their finished tomb. Why we can only guess at. [2000]

Evidence for the Mycenaean Age Paralleling the El Amarna Age

This evidence is based on papyrus fragments found by Pendlebury in 1936 in House R 43:2 when he wrote, "finds in this building included a complete Mycenaean vase (the second complete example found on the site) and a number of fragments of papyrus - still awaiting a proper treatment.' This treatment was accomplished by Bridget Leach (Conservation Department of the British Museum). All the fragments of the painted papyrus portion have now been positioned with reasonable certainty. They show 3 accumulations of small fragments (right to left) as part of a battle scene, a) `Libyan archers are depicted attacking a fallen Egyptian in a rocky terrain'; b) the middle scene shows running troops and an archer shooting an arrow; c) running foot soldiers. The significance of these scenes is that they show the unusual feature of a type of helmet on some of the running troops which are said to be remarkably similar to boar tusk helmets as found in Mycenaean images. One of the helmeted figures is also interpreted to wear a cropped ox-hide tunic which also has Aegean parallels.[2100]



The Strange Ending of the 18th Dynasty
In part based on `Oedipus and Akhnaton', I. Velikovski

With the passing of Amenophis IV (Akhnaton) the affairs surrounding the remaining rulers need to be retold so we may understand that there was no such thing as a transition from the 18th to the 19th Dynasty.

It was in 1907 that Theodore M. Davis, a business man from Rhode Island, who became interested in archaeological excavations while making a chance visit to Egypt, decided to clear a small area in the Valley of the Kings (Tomb 55). After having exposed several other tombs in times past, this time he found the undisturbed tomb of Yuya [2200] and Tuya, Queen Tiy's parents. Inside Davis found 4 beautifully made canopic jars of alabaster with identically carved lids. The heads were made by master craftsmen. [2300] The eyes were open, the irises and pupils inlaid with dark stones. The jars had once the name of their owner incised in them but now they were chiseled away. Inside the jar he found cloth material which had been soaked in bitumen but nothing else remained.

On the floor Davis found gold covered "doors" bearing the name of Queen Tiy. These doors were later judged to have been the sides of the catafalque inside which the coffin lay once enclosed. One of the partly with rubbish covered doors showed the full figure of the Queen engraved into metal foil. She was dressed in a thin, translucent tunic showing the contours of her body.
The figure of Akhnaton standing right in front had been chiseled out. The coffin itself was made of wood covered with gold foil and inlaid with precious stones. It had been dropped cracking its side wide open exposing the head and neck of the mummy. The small mummy's head bore the circle of a gold crown. The head and hands were delicate indicating to Davis that he had found the mummy of a female. The mummy wore fine textured clothing and had a perfect set of teeth which turned to dust at the slightest touch. The whole body was covered with pure gold foil sheets but thick enough that when put upright they would not sag.

The presence of jewelry, a necklace and gold foil proved that the tomb had never been robbed. Yet, the tomb was extremely disorderly. The burial place chosen also seemed inappropriate for a queen since her servants had better constructed ones than she did. No pictures adorned the walls, it was just a rough cut hole in the ground. Someone had broken the catafalque apart and put some pieces of it on top of some rubble stones in the entrance corridor. The erasure of the names also did not make it easier to solve the enigma.

When Gaston Maspero studied the artifacts he found those of Queen Tiy but decided the coffin to have more the appearance of having been made for Akhnaton. Even though the name had been erased, the titles were still legible. He read, "living in truth" an epithet typically used by this king. Hieroglyphics also were typical epithets used by Akhnaton. However, the age determined by the anatomist spoke against this mummy to have been that of Akhnaton who reigned for some 16 years and was a grown man when he became king. Despite the findings of the anatomist, Maspero was joined by Arthur Weigall in declaring the mummy to be that of Akhnaton. They relied upon the fact that in the `foundation' deposits bricks were found bearing royal seal impressions of Akhnaton and again others bearing that of Thutankhamen.

There was only one other clue, a prayer or a love song cut with a stylus in the gold foil under the feet of the mummy. This prayer was not included in the report made by Davis and Maspero but was translated and published later.
"I inhale the sweet breeze that comes from thy mouth,
I contemplate thy beauty every day.
It's my desire to hear thy lovely voice
like the north wind's whiff.
Love will rejuvenate my limbs.
Give me thy hands that hold thy soul,
I shall embrace and live by it.
Call me by name again, again, forever,
and never will it sound without response.
It read like the parting song of a survivor to the deceased. The text of it had been secreted under the feet. The name of the author had been erased.

Later Dr. G. Elliot Smith, a professor of anatomy, examined the remains and declared the body to be male about 25 to 26 years old based on ossification. This age was later reduced to 24 years old by Dr. Derry, who took over the position of Dr. Smith, who agreed to the reduction in age of the mummy. Also, the skull bore evidence of hydrocephalus according to Smenkhare IDr. Smith, an abnormal condition in which the frontal part of the cranium is extended but never the occipital part, as is the case with the cranium of Akhnaton. This finding, too, was later judged a normal family related feature by Dr. Derry. He asked Dr. Engelbach, an Egyptologist, to examine the evidence and determine whose body it could be. He decided it was the mummy of Smenkhare, a favorite of Akhnaton, who also bore those titles.[2320] A comparison of the mummy remains of `Smenkhare' and `Thutankhamen' revealed that they were brothers. This fact has reportedly been confirmed more recently by determining the blood group on the bases of small amounts of remaining skin of the mummy of KV55 (Amarna cage tomb) as the rare A2 type which also happens to be the type of the mummy of Tuthankhamen. It may be of interest that in the Spring of 2000 two stamped jar handles with the cartouches of Neb-kheperu-ra (Tutankhamun) and Ankh-kheperu-ra wa-en-ra (Smenkhekara) were found during excavations at Tel el Borg in the northern Sinai. KV62 is also of Tutankhamen. [2350]


On the subject of the coffin of Akhenaten found in the tomb (KV55) all the inscriptions on the trough and lid are described by W.J. Murnane. [2400]
Professor G. Martin concluded that the cartouche of Akhenaten in Kiya's titulary on the coffin lid had not been hacked out, but very carefully cut out, as if in preparation for the insertion of another name. That makes it appear that the coffin was adapted for someone other than Akhenaten.

The Mystery Surrounding the Sun God's Servants

To borrow in part a title from a late issue of National Geographic magazine focusing on `Raiay' or `Hatiay', the son of a goldsmith who apparently became a top administrator under Akhnaton. The unfinished tomb was found by Alain Zivie who discusses the presumed religious changes taking place during his time. [2500]

The Succession After Akhnaton

After Akhnaton's 17-19 year reign had come to an end, Smenkhare reigned for a short time. The latest date mentioned is the third year which included perhaps a period of coregency with his father. After his short reign there appears to have been a rivalry between the two brothers, Tut-ankh-amen and Smenkhare, and that Smenkhare was killed at that time. Since both of these brothers were very young when they began, the power behind them was thought to have been that of "General, Chief Priest, Court Chamberlain" Ay. It was Ay, probably the brother of Tiy, who buried Tutankhamen several years after the death of Smenkhare, whose cartouche was found in the tomb and he is being shown administering the mortuary rites of `the opening of the mouth' at the funeral. [2550]

Coming back to the story of Smenkhare, in life Smenkhare wore already the regalia of the king when Akhnaton was still alive since they are shown on the same bas relief indicating that Akhnaton gave away his royal power in his life time while Smenkhare was still in his teens. Akhnaton on the other hand did not lose his throne by death but probably was forced to abdicate his crown on account of becoming blind. The clue that this might be the truth about the end of Akhnaton is the fact that Akhnaton called his capital city by a name so similar to his own that R.W. Rogers wrote: "A new city, bearing the king's name was erected." [2600] As V. wrote: "Herodotus rendered the names Akhnaton and Akhet-Aton as the basis for the name Anysis (the blind man) ..."who also, according to Herodotus, came from a city bearing his name. Is there any other evidence that Akhnaton became blind? "Although a man sees the facts, yet the two eyes of the king, my lord, do not see ..." [EA#288] These were the words written by a vassal king to Akhnaton. They may not have been written to refer to a physical disability but we cannot exclude that entirely just because its hard to imagine. Another, perhaps better reference is a poem which reads:

The sun of him that knew thee not hath set, O Amun,
But he that knoweth thee, he shineth.
The weba[2700] of him that assailed thee is in darkness,
while the whole earth is in sunlight.
Whoso putteth thee in his heart, O Amun,
lo, his sun hath risen."
[2800]

Some say the end of Akhnaton was sudden, others it was gradual. His city was abandoned by everyone. Archaeologists could find no evidence that anyone was buried in the tombs of the nobles of Akhet-Aton. Later kings omitted Akhnaton and his heirs in their Karnak and Abydos lists of pharaohs. Where his name should be they wrote: "that criminal of Akhet Aten". [2900] But the account of Herodotus of Anysis going into exile for over 50 years and bringing in the story about Sabacos, the Ethiopian, then, after 50 years returning to become king, could hardly be possible in the life time of one man. Sabacos (Shabaka) belongs to the end of the 8th century BC while Akhnaton lived in the 2nd half of the 9th century BC.

The End of the 18th Dynasty and Horemheb

Considering these circumstances we cannot find any person like Horemheb in the days of Akhnaton and Tut-ankh-amen. We must also keep in mind that the King lists of Abydos and Karnak do not mention the kings of the Libyan and Ethiopian dynasties. When the lists then jump from Amenhotep III straight to Horemheb is that not necessarily an indication of actual chronological sequence without gaps. 18th Dynasty glassmaking - ThutankhamonOften conventional historians make the assumption that Horemheb was a member of the court of Akhnaton which we find to be without good reasons. As we point out elsewhere, when the cartouche of Horemheb is found together with that of King Tutankhamun, is that on commemorative stones not contemporary with the period of the kings and cannot be used as indication of chronological association.

The painted war scene on a chest in the tomb of Tutankhamen against what looks like Ethiopians and/or Libyans may have been the occasion for the death of both (perhaps arranged by Ay?), Smenkhare and Thutankhamen. [3000] Both received royal burials but Ay, for whatever reason, saw to it that Smenkhare did not receive honors due to a king. It appears that someone (perhaps a sister) in disobedience to the command of Ay hid the body of Smenkhare in the roughly hewn cave and burned a few boughs in his honor.

Davis found yet another grave which did not get into the official report but deserved to be recorded.

"A short time ago, I found a small pit tomb three hundred feet from Tiyi's tomb. It was covered with rock and sand about three feet deep. It proved to be about seven feet square and six feet deep. It was filled with white jars sealed with covers." [3100]

We would like to enumerate the following facts about tomb 55 and cite suggested conclusions:

Facts about Tiyi, Tut-ankh-amen and Aye

1. Amenhotep III broke tradition by marrying Tiyi [3150] who used a title `Queen's nurse' for having raised Nefretete.
2. Tut-ankh-amen's queen was sixteen year old Ankhesenpaaten. They had two children who were stillborn and their mummies were found in his tomb.
3. In order to establish his right to the throne Ay married the widow of Tut-ankh-amen, Ankhesenpaaten who was renamed Ankhesenamen, his own granddaughter. But not very long and we hear no more of Ankhesenamen. [3200]
4. While Akhnaton and Smenkhare used the appellation `living in truth', Ay used and described himself as one `Who is doing right', a rather unusual appellation in the history of Egypt.
5. The appellation was probably used by Ay to profess that he did his duty to the crown and Egypt by deposing Akhnaton, installing Akhnaton's sons and then siding with the younger son in the brother's conflict and imprisoning Meritaten in the pit tomb.
6. Ay's second wife and his later queen was Ty who bore the same name as Tiy, Ay's sister; the names are spelled differently only for us to be able to tell them apart.
7. The relationship between Ay, Yuya and Thuya was proposed based upon the similarity of the names of the Akhmim family. This Akhmim family was very closely related to the last pharaohs of the 18th Dynasty, and provided not only Queen Tiyi, who married Amenhotep III, but also Nefertiti. Ay is thought to having been Neferitit's father on the basis of his title `God's Father', which is understood to mean `God's Father-in-Law'. Yuya used this same title thought to provide more evidence in favor of the previous supposition regarding Neferitit. But who was the mother of Nefertiti? She was not Ay's later wife, Tiyi, who is described as a nurse. Therefore, they say, it must have been an earlier wife. Yuya was the father of Tiyi according to Cyril Aldred, 1988. See also Damien Mackey's paper first published on CIAS here and compare to Donald B. Redford, `The Monotheism of the Heretic Pharaoh' in BAR, May 1987, p. 16-32.
8. Ay's cruelty toward Meritaten was also dictated by him perceiving the need to prevent some other pretender to the throne from marrying Smenkhare's widow, the eldest daughter of Akhnaton, and by doing so have more rights to the throne than he himself.
9. Nefretete was a daughter of Ay by an earlier marriage who was nursed and raised by Tiyi. [3300]
10. Tutankhamen's tomb had originally been for Ay by his brother in law, Amenhotep III, not far from the tomb of his parents, Yuya and Tuya, in the Valley of the Kings. The tomb was located close to that of Amenhotep III. It is possible Tut's tomb was first planned to be for Smenkhare, when he was king for about one year but neither of the brothers was entombed in it. Aye finished the large tomb for himself.
11. Ay's reign lasted about four years and did not end peacefully. "Anarchy ensued. Thebes was a prey of plundering bands who forced their way into the royal tombs." [3400]
12. The invaders did the greatest damage to the tomb of Ay. It was not an act of robbing but one of violence and vengeance. [3500]
13. It is likely that these invading bands were once before called in by Smenkhare to help him regain the throne.
The love poem found underneath the feet of the mummy

1. Smenkhars's nomen name included `Nerfer-nef-ruaten' which once belonged to Nefertiti.
2. From this we should not conclude that Nefertiti wrote a love song to Akhnaton in his grave.
3. The possible allusion to Smenkhare in the poem has nothing to do with the ownership of the coffin itself.
4. The love poem to Smenkhare was written by a female and he was called `brother'.
5. The coffin (KV55) supposedly with the mummy of Smenkhare, bears the royal uraeus at the head and the royal scepter in his hands [3550], was made for Akhnaton and the catafalque for Tiy.
6. The latest identification of the head of the canopic jar lids is that of the eldest daughter of Akhnaton and consort of Smenkhare, Meritaten. Meritaten was the sister or half sister and queen wife of Smenkhare.
7. It appears that the person who secreted the love poem underneath the feet of the mummy was the same who carefully obliterated (not to destroy) the name on her own canopic jars and placed them into the tomb.
8. It appears that Meritaten introduced whatever precious objects she could find into the tomb.
9. Some miniature canopic coffins, one of the enormous gold shrines and adornments which covered the mummy had originally been made for Smenkhare but were usurped for the funeral of Tut-ankh-amen.
10. The intruders to tomb 55 were agents of Ay. They used the same seal - a jackal over nine prisoners - which appears on the door of Tut-ankh-amen's grave and the pit in the rock with the clay vessels in it.

The pit in the rock tomb

The pit in the rock tomb was found in 1908 and is located 300 feet from Tiyi's, 120 yards from King Tut's and 100 yards from tomb 55. It measured:
7 x 7 x 6 feet according to Davis 6.5 x 4.25 x 7 feet according to Winlock
Inside the tomb numerous objects were found:
a) many pots, vessels and small cups 1) too small to serve more than one meal and therefore hardly suitable for a funeral meal of a group of people.
2) 7 vessels of reddish-brown earthenware, have "labels written rapidly in hieratic from right to left in black ink" reading: corn, dsrt (a drink?), half loaf, grapes".
3) 65 identical, uninscribed cups
4) 1 wine jar
5) a number of bottles
6) several water drinking vessels
7) 60 odd dishes of varying sizes, colors and shapes many of which had been broken and thrown into the larger jars
8) 4 chips from a painted bowl
9) 3 lids of baked clay with a red slip the smallest of which had a thick crust of black soot
the other two had traces of what looked like dried lamp oil
b) remains of food All meat was cooked
1) a shoulder blade from a cow showing hack marks of a clover
2) 4 ribs of sheep or goat
3) the majority of the bones were parts of the skeleton of 9 ducks belonging to 3 or 4 different species
4) bones of four geese of three different species
c) remains of some linen cloth 1. linen with blue-black marks painted on them
"The marks were among the most curious I have ever seen."
One mark was that giving the last year of the reign of King Tut, the other was woven by hand in white thread into the linen and read:"Long live the Good King Nofer." We are told that Nofer was the name Smenkhare assumed after Nefretete left Akhnaton.
2. 2 of the linens had the last year of the reign of Tut-ankh-amen on them
3. 1 sheet measured 2.44 meters long and 0.61 meters wide. (over 8x over 2 feet) - from this sheet a piece of the width from each side had been ripped off
"The sheet is of very fine, tightly woven but not heavy linen, with 36 warp threads and 28 woof threads to the centimeter." [3600]
d) six clay impressions of seals -
Tut's and Smenkhare's door jamb seal
1. 3 of these had the distinct cartouche of Tut-ankh-amen
2. 1 seal of the priest of the necropolis of the Valley of the Kings showing a jackal above 9 bound captives. [3700]
e) among the rags were three kerchiefs We are told that these kinds of kerchiefs were worn by women over their hair.
f) 6 or 7 hand made flower collars flower collars were made of olive leaves, cornflowers and berries of the nightshade
None of these collars were as elaborate as that found on the innermost coffin of King Tut and therefore it was assumed that none of those who had used the utensils mentioned had the rank of king
g) two very used looking `brooms' These consisted just of a bushy branch with a cord tied around the handle
h) a small, painted plaster mask of a young woman Such masks were made in the life time of a person usually of higher rank to be later placed into their mortuary chamber. Winlock wrote: "It looks like a miniature mummy mask such as we would ordinarily expect to find on canopic bundles..."
Comments: V. thought that this `Pit in the Rock' tomb had been used by the agents of Ay to imprison Meritaten, that she received food there until she used the torn off linen stripes to end her life. [There is no substitute for reading the book though.] Therefore, it could be that the small child depicted in the royal tomb at Amarna for the funeral of Meritaten was young Tutankhamun.

For our purposes we can see that the 18th Dynasty ended as a result of the double dealings of the ambitious Ay who brought the heirs of Akhnaton to their deaths possibly at the hands of the enemies. These Libyan enemies took advantage of the power vacuum in Egypt and established the 22nd Dynasty at the passing of Ay. Thus, the ending of the 18th Dynasty reminds us of the end of the 12th Dynasty, both had no heirs ready to wear the crown of Egypt after the death of their last king. No Amarna letter authored by Ay has been found.

There is no insurmountable indication whatsoever that someone like Horemheb lived at this time and took over the reigns of the country. Let us also not forget that the name of Horemheb was found in the tomb of Petamenophis located in the Valley of the Kings, TT33. Petamenophis was a highly placed official during the time of the Ethiopian Dynasty in Egypt. This tomb attracted early on the attention of archaeologists for its great size and ambitious layout in a prestigious location. It was first described by Richard Lepsius in his `Denkmäler' [3800] and judged by Rudolf Anthes and Grapow to be of Ethiopian times. [3900]

Therefore, we must follow the account found in Josephus on the three brothers to get the story on Armais/Harmhab as the ancients knew it. At least we have the backing of an ancient source and recommend to our readers to give this some thought.

Bridging the 18th and 22nd Dynasty according to the Revised Model

In our revision Sheshonk was a contemporary of Pharaoh Tutankhamon and Pharaoh Ay. During the time of the latter's reign it seems the `Stela of Shoshenk' makes references to when it addresses `His Majesty', meaning Pharaoh Ay. Convention assumes `His Majesty' refers to the 21st Dynasty Priest-king Pesibkhenno which does not make sense to us. We must ask the question, `What do we know about Pharaoh Ay and his relations to the Lybians?' Some point to Ay when it comes to the question how Tutankhamen and Smenkhare died. The painted chest from the tomb of Tutankhamen showing Africans/Ethiopians or more likely Lybians waging war against the Egyptians was arranged or supported by Ay to help him come to power. While the evidence is circumstantial, it makes sense in connection with Shoshenk I later coming to power in Egypt itself. There is then an overlap of reignal years probably from the time of Tutankhamen to the end of Ay with Shoshenk I's reignal years. [4000]

A few observations and comparisons to the Greek Oedipus story
1. The hundred gated Thebes in Egypt was the capital during 18th Dynasty times.
[Even though the city had no city wall with 100 gates, its vast temple enclosures gave the appearance of many gates.]
2. Amenhotep III
3. Sudden appearance of female sphinx
4. The shrine dedicated to Hathor of Der el Medinah
5. The colossi of Memnon gave oracular messages
6. Tiy was first the Queen of Amenhotep III.
7. Amenhotep III was the first and only pharaoh who had himself represented in female clothing.
[Cyril Aldred, `Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art', February 1957]
8. The reign of Amenhotep III ended abruptly.
9. Tiy was briefly the sole reigning monarch before the ascendency of Akhnaton. [EA#28]
10. Normal practice would be that the sons of the deceased king would make known his death. In the case of Amenhotep III the persons who made his death known are referred to as `they'; in other words they were not his sons. [EA#29]
11. Akhnaton was a stranger to the Egyptians. It appears he had arrived from abroad. EA letter #29 shows that Akhnaton did not know the correspondents of his father.
12. Akhnaton probably grew up in Mitanni, a kingdom whose exact location is not certain.
13. The sphinx of Thebes was destroyed probably by dropping it from a cliff near the temple of Hatshepsut at Deir el Bahari were many pieces of a broken sphinx were found. [4100]
1. The seven gated Thebes in Boetia (Greece) was founded by Cadmus and often opposed Athens.


2. Amenhotep III was the model for Laius.



6. Tiy was the model for Jocasta.
14. Tiy's brother was Ay and Ay was the father of Nefretete.
15. The parents of Tiy and Ay were Yuya and Tuya.
16. Akhnaton was a son of Tiy. Therefore Akhnaton's daughter with Tiy was also his sister.
17. Akhnaton had apparently at least three daughters: Meritaten, Ankhesenpaaten and Beketaten. He had two sons, Smenkhare and Tutankhamun.
18. Akhnaton had two wives and lived with his mother-wife in incest. His second wife was Nefretete.
19. Parennefer may have been the one who raised Akhnaton when an infant.
[A. Erman, H. Ranke, `Ägypten und Ägyptisches Leben im Altertum', (1923), pp. 133-134; C. Aldred, `The End of the El Amarna Period', Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. XLIII (1957), pp. 30-41]
14. Ay was the model for Creon.

16. Akhnaton was the model for Oedipus

17. Smenkhare may be the model for Eteocles and Tutankhamun for Polyneices. Meritaten may be the model for Antigone.

Valley of the Kings Tomb KV35 presently contains three mummies, walled up in their private chamber. Of the three, the 'elder woman' has been identified as Queen Tiy, Akhenaten's mother and subsequent wife, the '15-year old' boy as Thutmose V, who died too young to reign, and the 'younger woman' is generally held to be Nefertiti, though this identification is uncertain.

Conventional history is at a loss to explain why these three mummies should have been singled out for placement away from the others found reburied within the tomb.

Our revised history has no such difficulties. As Dr Velikovsky pointed out in Oedipus and Akhnaton, Queen Tiy corresponds to Queen Jocasta in the Oedipus legend, and took her own life. The wisdom teeth in the 'young woman' mummy have not emerged, which makes her too young to be Nefertiti. She is thus Smenkhare's sister and wife, Meritaten, the Antigone who secretly buried her brother's body and was immured living within a pit for her deed. Before long, she took her own life.

There is a common link between these 'isolated' mummies: suicide. This points to suicide as the cause of Thutmose V's premature death, and further enables us to identify him as Chrysippus of the Oedipus legend, the youth who took his own life when violated by Laius (Amenhotep III).(PW)


Additional Discoveries of Interest

"Early last November, coinciding with the 75th anniversary of the discovery of Tut Ankhamen's burial chamber, a French archeological team headed by Alain Zivie uncovered a most revealing Ancient Egyptian tomb in Sakkara a few kilometers south west of Cairo, not far from Memphis the sometime administrative capital of Ancient Egypt. Digging into rock below a modern day guest house and cafeteria, the French team discovered what appeared to be at first an Ancient Egyptian nobleman's tomb. A more thorough examination and -- bingo! The underground chamber revealed this was no mere nobleman's place of rest but was the tomb of Maya the divine wet nurse, a beautiful noblewoman whose highborn breasts had been suckled by the Pharaoh God, Tut Ankhamen. Engraved on the adjoining tombs' walls were members of the late 18th Dynasty nobility including priests, grandees, the chief of the royal treasury, ambassadors and three generations from a family of royal painters.

At a December 7, 1997 press conference held at the Egyptian Ministry of Culture, Zivie explained that this latest discovery was only the beginning. The French Egyptologist expected further consequential revelations to come out of Maya's near intact tomb. For instance, we may finally uncover who was King Tut's biological mother as opposed to his well known Divine Parenthood. Although we know King Tut Ankhamen was born in Tel al-Amarna and that he was reportedly the son of Amenhotep III (an earlier 18th-dynasty king), to this day no one determined who exactly gave birth to the Boy King. From his time also comes a hunting scene painted on the lid of a box found in his tomb showing the king standing in a chariot with a drawn bow, charging into a herd of running gazelles and ostriches. [4200]

Another unknown which might soon be cleared concerns the court painters depicted on the nearby murals. Are they the same ones who decorated the wonders that survived from that turbulent period? Many questions some of which are about to be answered.

Alain Zivie, meanwhile, too absorbed by what is in store for him the coming days, could not be bothered with King Tut's Curse.

Seventy five years since the discovery of the Boy King's burial chamber and the world is still spellbound by the mysteries of his enigmatic reign."
Press Release by Samir Rafaat, `Jordan Star', Dec. 11, 1997

Unfortunately, since this story came out, no new light has been shed on the origins of Tutankhamon.



Balaam - A Christian Reflection of 2009

Introduction
Balaam
The King of Moab
Balak invents a wicked plan
The Plot Thickens
Lessons to be Learned
Apostasy at the Jordan
Abominable Worship
The Path to Perdition
Lessons to be Learned
Notes & References


Introduction

The Great God was prepared to lead Israel into the Promised Land. But first must they be tested.

Returning to the Jordan from the conquest of Bashan, the Israelites, in preparation for the immediate invasion of Canaan, encamped beside the river, above its entrance into the Dead Sea, and just opposite the plain of Jericho. They were upon the very borders of Moab, and the Moabites were filled with terror at the close proximity of the invaders.

The people of Moab had not been molested by Israel, yet they had watched with troubled forebodings all that had taken place in the surrounding countries. Israel in the days of Balak and Balaam.The Amorites, before whom they had been forced to retreat, had been conquered by the Hebrews, and the territory which the Amorites had wrested from Moab was now in the possession of Israel. The hosts of Bashan had yielded before the mysterious power enshrouded in the cloudy pillar, and the giant strongholds were occupied by the Hebrews. The Moabites dared not risk an attack upon them; an appeal to arms was hopeless in face of the supernatural agencies that wrought in their behalf. But they determined, as Pharaoh had done, to enlist the power of sorcery to counteract the work of God. They would bring a curse upon Israel.

The people of Moab were closely connected with the Midianites, both by the ties of nationality and religion. And Balak, the king of Moab, aroused the fears of the kindred people, and secured their co-operation in his designs against Israel by the message, "Now shall this company lick up all that are round about us, as the ox licketh up the grass of the field." Balaam, an inhabitant of Mesopotamia, was reported to possess supernatural powers, and his fame had reached to the land of Moab. It was determined to call him to their aid. Accordingly, messengers of "the elders of Moab and the elders of Midian," were sent to secure his divinations and enchantments against Israel.

The ambassadors at once set out on their long journey over the mountains and across the deserts to Mesopotamia; and upon finding Balaam, they delivered to him the message of their king: "Behold, there is a people come out from Egypt: behold, they cover the face of the earth, and they abide over against me: come now therefore, I pray thee, curse me this people; for they are too mighty for me: peradventure I shall prevail, that we may smite them, and that I may drive them out of the land: for I wot that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed."

Balaam was once a good man and a prophet of God; but he had apostatized, and had given himself up to covetousness (desiring things his neighbors had) [4500]; yet he still professed to be a servant of the Most High. He was not ignorant of God's work in behalf of Israel; and when the messengers announced their errand, he well knew that it was his duty to refuse the rewards of Balak and to dismiss the ambassadors. But he ventured to dally with temptation, and urged the messengers to tarry with him that night, declaring that he could give no decided answer till he had asked counsel of the Lord. Balaam knew that his curse could not harm Israel. God was on their side, and so long as they were true to Him no adverse power of earth or hell could prevail against them. But his pride was flattered by the words of the ambassadors, "He whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed." The bribe of costly gifts and prospective exaltation excited his covetousness. He greedily accepted the offered treasures, and then, while professing strict obedience to the will of God, he tried to comply with the desires of Balak.

In the night season the angel of God came to Balaam with the message, "Thou shalt not go with them; thou shalt not curse the people: for they are blessed."

In the morning Balaam reluctantly dismissed the messengers, but he did not tell them what the Lord had said. Angry that his visions of gain and honor had been suddenly dispelled, he petulantly exclaimed, "Get you into your land: for the Lord refuseth to give me leave to go with you."

Balaam "loved the wages of unrighteousness." 2 Peter 2:15. He did not believe that all money is not good. Instead he was enthralled by bribery, corruption and flattery. The sin of covetousness, which God declares to be idolatry, had made him a timeserver, and through this one fault Satan gained entire control of him. It was this that caused his ruin. The tempter is ever presenting worldly gain and honor to entice men from the service of God. He tells them

  1. it is their overconscientiousness that keeps them from prosperity.
  2. Thus many are induced to venture out of the path of strict integrity.

    One wrong step makes the next easier, and they become more and more presumptuous. They will do and dare most terrible things when once they have given themselves to the control of avarice and a desire for power. Balaam did not resist sin and overcome.

  3. Many flatter themselves that they can depart from strict integrity for a time, for the sake of some worldly advantage, and that having gained their object, they can change their course when they please.

Such are entangling themselves in the snare of Satan, and it is seldom that they escape.

When the messengers reported to Balak the prophet's refusal to accompany them, they did not intimate that God had forbidden him. Supposing that Balaam's delay was merely to secure a richer reward, the king sent princes more in number and more honorable than the first, with promises of higher honors, and with authority to concede to any terms that Balaam might demand. Balak's urgent message to the prophet was, "Let nothing, I pray thee, hinder thee from coming unto me: for I will promote thee unto very great honor, and I will do whatsoever thou sayest unto me: come therefore, I pray thee, curse me this people."

A second time Balaam was tested. In response to the solicitations of the ambassadors he professed great conscientiousness and integrity, assuring them that no amount of gold and silver could induce him to go contrary to the will of God. But he longed to comply with the king's request; and although the will of God had already been definitely made known to him, he urged the messengers to tarry, that he might further inquire of God; as though the Infinite One were a man, to be persuaded. Thus his enlarging sin beclouded clear thinking.

In the night season the Lord appeared to Balaam and said, "If the men come to call thee, rise up, and go with them; but yet the word which I shall say unto thee, that shalt thou do." Thus far the Lord would permit Balaam to follow his own will, because he was determined upon it.

  • He did not seek to do the will of God, but chose his own course, and then endeavored to secure the sanction of the Lord.

    There are thousands at the present day who are pursuing a similar course. They would have no difficulty in understanding their duty if it were in harmony with their inclinations. It is plainly set before them in the Bible or is clearly indicated by circumstances and reason.

  • But because these evidences are contrary to their desires and inclinations they frequently set them aside and presume to go to God to learn their duty. - In other words such sin problems arise also among people in churches.

    With great apparent conscientiousness they pray long and earnestly for light. But God will not be trifled with. He often permits such persons to follow their own desires and to suffer the result. "My people would not hearken to My voice. . . . So I gave them up unto their own hearts' lust: and they walked in their own counsels." Psalm 81:11, 12. When one clearly sees a duty, let him not presume to go to God with the prayer that he may be excused from performing it. He should rather, with a humble, submissive spirit, ask for divine strength and wisdom to meet its claims.

    The Moabites were a degraded, idolatrous people; yet according to the light which they had received their guilt was not so great in the sight of Heaven as was that of Balaam who wanted the Lord to give up His ways, so he could have his ways, 1. Sam. 2:30; Jh. 12:26; Exodus 23:20-25. As he professed to be God's prophet, however, all he should say would be supposed to be uttered by divine authority. That is why he was not to be permitted to speak as he chose, but must deliver the message which God should give him. "The word which I shall say unto thee, that shalt thou do," was the divine command.

    Balaam had received permission to go with the messengers from Moab if they came in the morning to call him. That means, God is infinitely patient with us. But, annoyed at his delay, and expecting another refusal, they set out on their homeward journey without further consultation with him. Every excuse for complying with the request of Balak had now been removed. But Balaam was determined to secure the reward (his sin of coveteousness became more determined); and, taking the beast upon which he was accustomed to ride, he set out on the journey. He feared that even now the divine permission might be withdrawn, and he pressed eagerly forward, impatient lest he should by some means fail to gain the coveted reward.

    But "the angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him." The animal saw the divine messenger, who was unperceived by the man, and turned aside from the highway into a field. With cruel blows Balaam brought the beast back into the path; but again, in a narrow place shut in by walls, the angel appeared, and the animal, trying to avoid the menacing figure, crushed her master's foot against the wall. Balaam was blinded to the heavenly interposition, and knew not that God was obstructing his path. The man became exasperated, and beating the ass unmercifully, forced it to proceed.

    Again, "in a narrow place, where was no way to turn either to the right hand or to the left," the angel appeared, as before, in a threatening attitude; and the poor beast, trembling with terror, made a full stop, and fell to the earth under its rider. Balaam's rage was unbounded, and with his staff he smote the animal more cruelly than before. God now opened its mouth, and by "the dumb ass speaking with man's voice," he "forbade the madness of the prophet." 2 Peter 2:16. "What have I done unto thee," it said, "that thou hast smitten me these three times?"

    Furious at being thus hindered in his journey, Balaam answered the beast as he would have addressed an intelligent being -- "Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee." (Sin makes unreasonable). Here was a professed magician, on his way to pronounce a curse upon a whole people with the intent to paralyze their strength, while he had not power even to slay the animal upon which he rode!

    The eyes of Balaam were now opened, and he beheld the angel of God standing with drawn sword ready to slay him. In terror "he bowed down his head, and fell flat on his face." The angel said to him, "Wherefore hast thou smitten thine ass these three times? Behold, I went out to withstand thee, because thy way is perverse before me: and the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times: unless she had turned from me surely now also I had slain thee, and saved her alive."

    Balaam owed the preservation of his life to the poor animal that he had treated so cruelly. The man who claimed to be a prophet of the Lord, who declared that his eyes were open, and he saw the "vision of the Almighty," was so blinded by covetousness and ambition that he could not discern the angel of God visible to his beast. "The god of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not." 2 Corinthians 4:4. How many are thus blinded! (By their fruits we can know them.) They rush on in forbidden paths, transgressing the divine law, and cannot discern that God and His angels are against them. Like Balaam they are angry at those who would prevent their ruin.

    Balaam had given evidence of the spirit that controlled him, by his treatment of his beast. "A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel." Proverbs 12:10. Few realize as they should the sinfulness of abusing animals or leaving them to suffer from neglect. He who created man made the lower animals also, and "His tender mercies are over all His works." Psalm 145:9. The animals were created to serve man, but he has no right to cause them pain by harsh treatment or cruel exaction.

    It is because of man's sin that "the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together." Romans 8:22. Suffering and death were thus entailed, not only upon the human race, but upon the animals. Surely, then, it becomes man to seek to lighten, instead of increasing, the weight of suffering which his transgression has brought upon God's creatures. He who will abuse animals because he has them in his power is both a coward and a tyrant. A disposition to cause pain, whether to our fellow men or to the brute creation, is satanic. Many do not realize that their cruelty will ever be known, because the poor dumb animals cannot reveal it. But could the eyes of these men be opened, as were those of Balaam, they would see an angel of God standing as a witness, to testify against them in the courts above. A record goes up to heaven, and a day is coming when judgment will be pronounced against those who abuse God's creatures.

    When he beheld the messenger of God, Balaam exclaimed in terror, "I have sinned; for I knew not that thou stoodest in the way against me: now therefore, if it displease thee, I will get me back again." The Lord suffered him to proceed on his journey (God honors our free will), but gave him to understand that his words should be controlled by divine power. God would give evidence to Moab that the Hebrews were under the guardianship of Heaven, and this He did effectually when He showed them how powerless Balaam was even to utter a curse against them without divine permission.

    The King of Moab

    The king of Moab, being informed of the approach of Balaam, went out with a large retinue to the borders of his kingdom, to receive him. When he expressed his astonishment at Balaam's delay, in view of the rich rewards awaiting him, the prophet's answer was, "Lo, I am come unto thee: have I now any power at all to say anything? the word that God putteth in my mouth, that shall I speak." Balaam greatly regretted this restriction; he feared that his purpose could not be carried out, because the Lord's controlling power was upon him.

    With great pomp the king, with the chief dignitaries of his kingdom, escorted Balaam to "the high places of Baal," from which he could survey the Hebrew host. Behold the prophet as he stands upon the lofty height, looking down over the encampment of God's chosen people. How little do the Israelites know of what is taking place so near them! How little do they know of the care of God, extended over them by day and by night! How dull are the perceptions of God's people! How slow are they, in every age, to comprehend His great love and mercy! If they could discern the wonderful power of God constantly exerted in their behalf, would not their hearts be filled with gratitude for His love, and with awe at the thought of His majesty and power?

    Balaam had some knowledge of the sacrificial offerings of the Hebrews, and he hoped that by surpassing them in costly gifts he might secure the blessing of God and ensure the accomplishment of his sinful projects. Thus the sentiments of the idolatrous Moabites were gaining control of his mind. His wisdom had become foolishness; his spiritual vision was beclouded; he had brought blindness upon himself by yielding to the power of Satan.

    By Balaam's direction seven altars were erected, and he offered a sacrifice upon each. He then withdrew to a "high place," to meet with God, promising to make known to Balak whatever the Lord should reveal.

    With the nobles and princes of Moab the king stood beside the sacrifice, while around them gathered the eager multitude, watching for the return of the prophet. He came at last, and the people waited for the words that should paralyze forever that strange power exerted in behalf of the hated Israelites. Balaam said:

    "The king of Moab has brought me from Aram,
    Out of the mountains of the east,
    Saying, Come, curse me Jacob,
    And come, defy Israel.
    How shall I curse, whom God has not cursed?
    Or how shall I defy, whom the Lord has not defied?
    For from the top of the rocks I see him,
    And from the hills I behold him:
    Lo, the people shall dwell alone,
    And shall not be reckoned among the nations.
    (They are a special people.)
    Who can count the dust of Jacob,
    And the number of the fourth part of Israel?
    Let me die the death of the righteous,
    And let my last end be like his!"

    Balaam confessed that he came with the purpose of cursing Israel, but the words he uttered were directly contrary to the sentiments of his heart. He was constrained to pronounce blessings, while his soul was filled with curses.

    As Balaam looked upon the encampment of Israel he beheld with astonishment the evidence of their prosperity. They had been represented to him as a rude, disorganized multitude, infesting the country in roving bands that were a pest and terror to the surrounding nations; but their appearance was the reverse of all this. He saw the vast extent and perfect arrangement of their camp, everything bearing the marks of thorough discipline and order. He was shown the favor with which God regarded Israel, and their distinctive character as His chosen people. They were not to stand upon a level with other nations, but to be exalted above them all. "The people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations." At the time when these words were spoken the Israelites had no permanent settlement, and their peculiar character, their manners and customs, were not familiar to Balaam. But how strikingly was this prophecy fulfilled in the afterhistory of Israel! Through all the years of their captivity, through all the ages since they were dispersed among the nations, they have remained a distinct people. So the people of God--the true Israel -- though scattered throughout all nations, are on earth but sojourners, whose citizenship is in heaven.

    Not only was Balaam shown the history of the Hebrew people as a nation, but he beheld the increase and prosperity of the true (spiritual, Eph. 5:23,24) Israel of God to the close of time.

    1. He saw the special favor of the Most High attending those who love and fear Him.
    2. He saw them supported by His arm as they enter the dark valley of the shadow of death. And
    3. he beheld them coming forth from their graves, crowned with glory, honor, and immortality.
    4. He saw the redeemed rejoicing in the unfading glories of the earth made new.

      Gazing upon the scene, he exclaimed, "Who can count the dust of Jacob, and the number of the fourth part of Israel?" And as

    5. he saw the crown of glory on every brow, the joy beaming from every countenance, and looked forward to that endless life of unalloyed happiness,
  • he uttered the solemn prayer, "Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!"

    If Balaam had had a disposition to accept the light that God had given, he would now have made true his words; he would at once have severed all connection with Moab. He would no longer have presumed upon the mercy of God, but would have returned to Him with deep repentance. But Balaam loved the wages of unrighteousness, and these he was determined to secure.

    Balak had confidently expected a curse that would fall like a withering blight upon Israel; and at the words of the prophet he passionately exclaimed, "What hast thou done unto me? I took thee to curse mine enemies, and, behold, thou hast blessed them altogether." Balaam, seeking to make a virtue of necessity, professed to have spoken from a conscientious regard for the will of God the words that had been forced from his lips by divine power. His answer was, "Must I not take heed to speak that which the Lord has put in my mouth?"

    Balak invents a wicked plan

    Balak could not even now relinquish his purpose. He decided that the imposing spectacle presented by the vast encampment of the Hebrews had so intimidated Balaam that he dared not practice his divinations against them. The king determined to take the prophet to some point where only a small part of the host might be seen. If Balaam could be induced to curse them in detached parties, the whole camp would soon be devoted to destruction. On the top of an elevation called Pisgah another trial was made. Again seven altars were erected, whereon were placed the same offerings as at the first. The king and his princes remained by the sacrifices, while Balaam retired to meet with God. Again the prophet was entrusted with a divine message, which he was powerless to alter or withhold.

    When he appeared to the anxious, expectant company the question was put to him, "What has the Lord spoken?" The answer, as before, struck terror to the heart of king and princes:

    "God is not a man, that He should lie;
    Neither the son of man, that He should repent:
    Has He said, and shall He not do it?
    Or has He spoken, and shall He not make it good?
    Behold, I have received commandment to bless:
    And He has blessed; and I cannot reverse it.
    He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob,
    Neither has He seen perverseness in Israel:
    The Lord his God is with him,
    And the shout of a king is among them."

    Awed by these revelations, Balaam exclaimed, "Surely there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel." The great magician had tried his power of enchantment, in accordance with the desire of the Moabites; but concerning this very occasion it should be said of Israel, "What has God wrought!" While they were under the divine protection, no people or nation, though aided by all the power of Satan, should be able to prevail against them. (Think of our country and how far we have fallen away that we will never win a war again.) All the world should wonder at the marvelous work of God in behalf of His people--that a man determined to pursue a sinful course should be so controlled by divine power as to utter, instead of imprecations, the richest and most precious promises, in the language of sublime and impassioned poetry. And the favor of God at this time manifested toward Israel was to be an assurance of His protecting care for His obedient, faithful children in all ages. When Satan should inspire evil men to misrepresent, harass, and destroy God's people, this very occurrence would be brought to their remembrance, and would strengthen their courage and their faith in God.

    The king of Moab, disheartened and distressed, exclaimed, "Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all." Yet a faint hope still lingered in his heart, and he determined to make another trial. He now conducted Balaam to Mount Peor, where was a temple devoted to the licentious worship of Baal, their god. Here the same number of altars were erected as before, and the same number of sacrifices were offered; but Balaam went not alone, as at other times, to learn God's will. He made no pretense of sorcery, but standing beside the altars, he looked abroad upon the tents of Israel. Again the Spirit of God rested upon him, and the divine message came from his lips:

    "How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob,
    And thy tabernacles, O Israel!
    As the valleys are they spread forth, as gardens by the river's side,
    As the trees of lignaloes which the Lord has planted, and as cedar trees beside the waters.
    He shall pour the water out of his buckets, and his seed shall be in many waters,
    And his King shall be higher than Agag, and his kingdom shall be exalted. . . .
    He couched, he lay down as a lion, and as a great lion: who shall stir him up?
    Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee."

    The prosperity of God's people is here represented by some of the most beautiful figures to be found in nature. The prophet likens Israel to fertile valleys covered with abundant harvests; to flourishing gardens watered by never-failing springs; to the fragrant sandal tree and the stately cedar. The figure last mentioned is one of the most strikingly beautiful and appropriate to be found in the inspired word. The cedar of Lebanon was honored by all the people of the East. The class of trees to which it belongs is found wherever man has gone throughout the earth. From the arctic regions to the tropic zone they flourish, rejoicing in the heat, yet braving the cold; springing in rich luxuriance by the riverside, yet towering aloft upon the parched and thirsty waste. They plant their roots deep among the rocks of the mountains and boldly stand in defiance of the tempest. Their leaves are fresh and green when all else has perished at the breath of winter. Above all other trees the cedar of Lebanon is distinguished for its strength, its firmness, its undecaying vigor; and this is used as a symbol of those whose life is "hid with Christ in God." Colossians 3:3. Says the Scripture, "The righteous . . . shall grow like a cedar." Psalm 92:12. The divine hand has exalted the cedar as king over the forest. "The fir trees were not like his boughs, and the chestnut trees were not like his branches" (Ezekiel 31:8); nor any tree in the garden of God. The cedar is repeatedly employed as an emblem of royalty, and its use in Scripture to represent the righteous shows how Heaven regards those who do the will of God.

    Balaam prophesied that Israel's King would be greater and more powerful than Agag. This was the name given to the kings of the Amalekites, who were at this time a very powerful nation; but Israel, if true to God, would subdue all her enemies. The King of Israel was the Son of God; and His throne was one day to be established in the earth, and His power to be exalted above all earthly kingdoms.

    As he listened to the prophet's words Balak was overwhelmed with disappointed hope, with fear and rage. He was indignant that Balaam could have given him the least encouragement of a favorable response, when everything was determined against him. He regarded with scorn the prophet's compromising, deceptive course. The king exclaimed fiercely, "Therefore now flee thou to thy place: I thought to promote thee unto great honor; but, lo, the Lord has kept thee back from honor." The answer was that the king had been forewarned that Balaam could speak only the message given him from God.

    Before returning to his people, Balaam uttered a most beautiful and sublime prophecy of the world's Redeemer and the final destruction of the enemies of God: "I shall see Him, but not now: I shall behold Him, but not nigh:

    There shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
    And shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth."
    Num. 24:17; Mt. 2:2; Rom. 8:38,39.

    And he closed by predicting the complete destruction of Moab and Edom, of Amalek and the Kenites, thus leaving to the Moabitish king no ray of hope. - (Balak, the king of Moab knew he was fighting for the survival of his nation. He found out that God would not forsake His people.)

    The Plot Thickens

    Disappointed in his hopes of wealth and promotion, in disfavor with the king, and conscious that he had incurred the displeasure of God, Balaam returned from his self-chosen mission. After he had reached his home the controlling power of the Spirit of God left him, and his covetousness, which had been merely held in check, prevailed. He was ready to resort to any means to gain the reward promised by Balak. Balaam knew that the prosperity of Israel depended upon their obedience to God, and that there was no way to cause their overthrow but by seducing them into sin. He now decided to secure Balak's favor by advising the Moabites of the course to be pursued to bring a curse upon Israel in order to separate them from God.

    He immediately returned to the land of Moab and laid his plans before the king. The Moabites themselves were convinced that so long as Israel remained true to God, He would be their shield. The plan proposed by Balaam was to separate them from God by enticing them into idolatry. If they could be led to engage in the licentious worship of Baal and Ashtaroth, their omnipotent Protector would become their enemy, and they would soon fall a prey to the fierce, warlike nations around them. This plan was readily accepted by the king, and Balaam himself remained to assist in carrying it into effect.

    Balaam witnessed the success of his diabolical scheme. He saw the curse of God visited upon His people, and thousands falling under His judgments; but the divine justice that punished sin in Israel did not permit the tempters to escape. In the war of Israel against the Midianites, Balaam was slain, Num. 31:8. He had felt a presentiment that his own end was near when he exclaimed, "Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!" But he had not chosen to live the life of the righteous, and his destiny was fixed with the enemies of God.

    Lessons to be Learned

    The fate of Balaam was similar to that of Judas, and their characters bear a marked resemblance to each other. Both these men tried to unite the service of God and mammon, and met with signal failure. Balaam acknowledged the true God, and professed to serve Him; Judas believed in Jesus as the Messiah, and united with His followers. But Balaam hoped to make the service of Jehovah the steppingstone to the acquirement of riches and worldly honor (As did Simon Magus, Acts 8:9-25); and failing in this he stumbled and fell and was broken. Judas expected by his connection with Christ to secure wealth and promotion in that worldly kingdom which, as he believed, the Messiah was about to set up. The failure of his hopes drove him to apostasy and ruin. Both Balaam and Judas had received great light and enjoyed special privileges, but a single cherished sin poisoned the entire character and caused their destruction.

    It is a perilous thing to allow an unchristian trait to live in the heart. One cherished sin will, little by little, debase the character, bringing all its nobler powers into subjection to the evil desire. The removal of one safeguard from the conscience, the indulgence of one evil habit, one neglect of the high claims of duty, breaks down the defenses of the soul and opens the way for Satan to come in and lead us astray. The only safe course is to let our prayers go forth daily from a sincere heart, as did David, "Hold up my goings in Thy paths, that my footsteps slip not." Psalm 17:5.

    Apostasy at the Jordan

    With joyful hearts and renewed faith in God, the victorious armies of Israel had returned from Bashan. They had already gained possession of a valuable territory, and they were confident of the immediate conquest of Canaan. Only the river Jordan lay between them and the Promised Land. Just across the river was a rich plain, covered with verdure, watered with streams from copious fountains, and shaded by luxuriant palm trees. On the western border of the plain rose the towers and palaces of Jericho, so embosomed in its palm-tree groves that it was called "the city of palm trees." Dt. 34:3.

    On the eastern side of Jordan, between the river and the high tableland which they had been traversing, was also a plain, several miles in width and extending some distance along the river. This sheltered valley had the climate of the tropics; here flourished the shittim, or acacia, tree, giving to the plain the name, "Vale of Shittim." It was here that the Israelites encamped, and in the acacia groves by the riverside they found an agreeable retreat.

    Abominable Worship

    But amid these attractive surroundings they were to encounter an evil more deadly than mighty hosts of armed men or the wild beasts of the wilderness. That country, so rich in natural advantages, had been defiled by the inhabitants. In the public worship of Baal, the leading deity, the most degrading and iniquitous scenes were constantly enacted. On every side were places noted for idolatry and licentiousness, the very names being suggestive of the vileness and corruption of the people. [4800]

    These surroundings exerted a polluting influence upon the Israelites (Like many of our cities). Their minds became familiar with the vile thoughts constantly suggested; their life of ease and inaction produced its demoralizing effect; and almost unconsciously to themselves they were departing from God and coming into a condition where they would fall an easy prey to temptation.

    During the time of their encampment beside Jordan, Moses was preparing for the occupation of Canaan. In this work the great leader was fully employed; but to the people this time of suspense and expectation was most trying, and before many weeks had elapsed their history was marred by the most frightful departures from virtue and integrity.

    At first there was little intercourse between the Israelites and their heathen neighbors, but after a time Midianitish women began to steal into the camp. Their appearance excited no alarm, and so quietly were their plans conducted that the attention of Moses was not called to the matter. It was the object of these women, in their association with the Hebrews, to seduce them into transgression of the law of God, to draw their attention to heathen rites and customs, and lead them into idolatry. These motives were studiously concealed under the garb of friendship, so that they were not suspected, even by the guardians of the people.

    The Path to Perdition

    At Balaam's suggestion, a grand festival in honor of their gods was appointed by the king of Moab, and it was secretly arranged that Balaam should induce the Israelites to attend. (People, young people, beware!! This happens especially today in schools, churches, among supposed friends, the world.) He was regarded by them as a prophet of God, and therefore had little difficulty in accomplishing his purpose. Great numbers of the people joined him in witnessing the festivities. They ventured upon the forbidden ground, and were entangled in the snare of Satan.

    1. Beguiled with music and dancing, and
    2. allured by the beauty of heathen vestals,
    3. they cast off their fealty (fidelity, faithfulness) to Jehovah. As
    4. they united in mirth and feasting,
    5. indulgence in wine beclouded their senses and broke down the barriers of self-control.
    6. Passion had full sway; and having
    7. defiled their consciences by lewdness,
    8. they were persuaded to bow down to idols.
    9. They offered sacrifice upon heathen altars and participated in the most degrading rites.

    It was not long before the poison had spread, like a deadly infection, through the camp of Israel. Those who would have conquered their enemies in battle were overcome by the wiles of heathen women. The people seemed to be infatuated. The rulers and the leading men were among the first to transgress, and so many of the people were guilty that the apostasy became national. "Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor." When Moses was aroused to perceive the evil, the plots of their enemies had been so successful that not only were the Israelites participating in the licentious worship at Mount Peor, but the heathen rites were coming to be observed in the camp of Israel. The aged leader was filled with indignation, and the wrath of God was kindled.

    Their iniquitous practices did that for Israel which all the enchantments of Balaam could not do -- they separated them from God. By swift-coming judgments [5000] the people were awakened to the enormity of their sin. A terrible pestilence broke out in the camp, to which tens of thousands speedily fell a prey. God commanded that the leaders in this apostasy be put to death by the magistrates. (Israel was then a theocracy!!) This order was promptly obeyed. The offenders were slain, then their bodies were hung up in sight of all Israel that the congregation, seeing the leaders so severely dealt with, might have a deep sense of God's abhorrence of their sin and the terror of His wrath against them.

    All felt that the punishment was just, and the people hastened to the tabernacle, and with tears and deep humiliation confessed their sin. (That hasn't happened anymore for a long time, probably since this time.) While they were thus weeping before God, at the door of the tabernacle, while the plague was still doing its work of death, and the magistrates were executing their terrible commission, Zimri, one of the nobles of Israel, came boldly into the camp, accompanied by a Midianitish harlot, a princess "of a chief house in Midian," whom he escorted to his tent. Never was vice bolder or more stubborn. Inflamed with wine, Zimri declared his "sin as Sodom," and gloried in his shame. (Drinking of such strong drinks is forbidden by God, (Lev. 10:9; Judges 13; Prov. 20:1) The priests and leaders had prostrated themselves in grief and humiliation, weeping "between the porch and the altar," and entreating the Lord to spare His people, and give not His heritage to reproach, when this prince in Israel flaunted his sin in the sight of the congregation, as if to defy the vengeance of God and mock the judges of the nation. Phinehas, the son of Eleazar the high priest, rose up from among the congregation, and seizing a javelin, "he went after the man of Israel into the tent," and slew them both. Thus the plague was stayed, while the priest who had executed the divine judgment was honored before all Israel, and the priesthood was confirmed to him and to his house forever.

    Phinehas "has turned My wrath away from the children of Israel," was the divine message; "wherefore say, Behold, I give unto him My covenant of peace: and he shall have it, and his seed after him, even the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for His God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel." (Num. 25).

    The judgments visited upon Israel for their sin at Shittim [5200], destroyed the survivors of that vast company, who, nearly forty years before, had incurred the sentence, "They shall surely die in the wilderness." (Num. 26:65) The numbering of the people by divine direction, during their encampment on the plains of Jordan, showed that "of them whom Moses and Aaron the priest numbered, when they numbered the children of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai (Num. 3:1-39), . . . there was not left a man of them, save Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun." Numbers 26:64, 65.

    God had sent judgments upon Israel for yielding to the enticements of the Midianites; but the tempters were not to escape the wrath of divine justice. The Amalekites, who had attacked Israel at Rephidim, falling upon those who were faint and weary behind the host, were not punished till long after; but the Midianites who seduced them into sin were speedily made to feel God's judgments, as being the more dangerous enemies. "Avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites" (Numbers 31:2), was the command of God to Moses;"afterward shalt thou be gathered unto thy people." This mandate was immediately obeyed. One thousand men were chosen from each of the tribes and sent out under the leadership of Phinehas. "And they warred against the Midianites, as the Lord commanded Moses. . . . And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; . . . five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor they slew with the sword." Verses 7, 8. The women also, who had been made captives by the attacking army, were put to death at the command of Moses, as the most guilty and most dangerous of the foes of Israel. (For persistently unrepentant sinners there is a point of no return.)

    Such was the end of them that devised mischief against God's people. Says the psalmist: "The heathen are sunk down in the pit that they made: in the net which they hid is their own foot taken." Psalm 9:15. "For the Lord will not cast off His people, neither will He forsake His inheritance. But judgment shall return unto righteousness." When men "gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous," the Lord "shall bring upon them their own iniquity, and shall cut them off in their own wickedness." Psalm 94:14, 15, 21, 23.

    When Balaam was called to curse the Hebrews he could not, by all his enchantments, bring evil upon them; for the Lord had not "beheld iniquity in Jacob," neither had He "seen perverseness in Israel." Numbers 23:21, 23. But when through yielding to temptation they transgressed God's law, their defense departed from them. When the people of God are faithful to His commandments, "there is no enchantment against Jacob, neither is there any divination against Israel." That is why all the power and wily arts of Satan are exerted to seduce them into sin. If those who profess to be the depositaries of God's law become transgressors of its precepts, they separate themselves from God, and they will be unable to stand before their enemies.

    The Israelites, who could not be overcome by the arms or by the enchantments of Midian, fell a prey to her harlots. Such is the power that woman, enlisted in the service of Satan, has exerted to entrap and destroy souls. "She has cast down many wounded: yea, many strong men have been slain by her." Proverbs 7:26. It was thus that the children of Seth were seduced from their integrity, and the holy seed became corrupt. It was thus that Joseph was tempted. Thus Samson betrayed his strength, the defense of Israel, into the hands of the Philistines. Here David stumbled. And Solomon, the wisest of kings, who had thrice been called the beloved of his God, became a slave of passion, and sacrificed his integrity to the same bewitching power. [See Gen. 6:1,2; 39:7,8; Judges 16:1,20; 2.Sam. 11:2; 1.Kings 11:1. We are not immune today from this, 1.Cor. 10:11.]

    Lessons to be Learned

    "Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall." 1 Corinthians 10:11, 12. Satan well knows the material with which he has to deal in the human heart. He knows -- for he has studied with fiendish intensity for thousands of years -- the points most easily assailed in every character; and through successive generations he has wrought to overthrow the strongest men, princes in Israel, by the same temptations that were so successful at Baalpeor. All along through the ages there are strewn wrecks of character that have been stranded upon the rocks of sensual indulgence. As we approach the close of time, as the people of God stand upon the borders of the heavenly Canaan, Satan will, as of old, redouble his efforts to prevent them from entering the goodly land. He lays his snares for every soul. It is not the ignorant and uncultured merely that need to be guarded; he will prepare his temptations for those in the highest positions, in the most holy office; if he can lead them to pollute their souls, he can through them destroy many. And he employs the same agents now as he employed three thousand years ago. By worldly friendships, by the charms of beauty, by pleasure seeking, mirth, feasting, or the wine cup, he tempts to the violation of the seventh commandment.

    Satan seduced Israel into licentiousness (unrestrained lawlessness) before leading them to idolatry. Those who

    1. will dishonor God's image and
    2. defile His temple in their own persons
    3. will not scruple at any dishonor to God that
    4. will gratify the desire of their depraved hearts.

    Sensual indulgence weakens the mind and debases the soul. The moral and intellectual powers are benumbed and paralyzed by the gratification of the animal propensities; and it is impossible for the slave of passion to realize the sacred obligation of the law of God, to appreciate the atonement, or to place a right value upon the soul. Goodness, purity, and truth, reverence for God, and love for sacred things--all those holy affections and noble desires that link men with the heavenly world--are consumed in the fires of lust. The soul becomes a blackened and desolate waste, the habitation of the evil spirits, and the "cage of every unclean and hateful bird." Beings formed in the image of God are dragged down to a level with the brutes.

    It was by associating with idolaters and joining in their festivities that the Hebrews were led to transgress God's law and bring His judgments upon the nation. So now it is by leading the followers of Christ to associate with the ungodly and unite in their amusements that Satan is most successful in alluring them into sin. "Come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean." 2 Corinthians 6:16-17-18; Phil; 4:8. God requires of His people now as great a distinction from the world, in customs, habits, and principles, as He required of Israel anciently. If they faithfully follow the teachings of His word, this distinction will exist; it cannot be otherwise. That is why in the last days God's people will be called fanaatics. The warnings given to the Hebrews against assimilating with the heathen were not more direct or explicit than are those forbidding Christians to conform to the spirit and customs of the ungodly. Christ speaks to us, "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15. "The friendship of the world is enmity with God; whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4. The followers of Christ are to separate themselves from sinners, choosing their society only when there is opportunity to do them good. We cannot be too decided in shunning the company of those who exert an influence to draw us away from God. While we pray, "Lead us not into temptation," we are to shun temptation, so far as possible.

    It was when

    1. the Israelites were in a condition of outward ease and security that they were led into sin.
    2. They failed to keep God ever before them,
    3. they neglected prayer and
    4. cherished a spirit of self-confidence.
    5. Ease and self-indulgence left the citadel of the soul unguarded, and
    6. debasing thoughts and imaginations found entrance.

    It was the traitors within the walls that overthrew the strongholds of principle and betrayed Israel into the power of Satan. It is thus that Satan still seeks to compass the ruin of the soul. A long preparatory process, unknown to the world, goes on in the heart before the Christian commits open sin. The mind does not come down at once from purity and holiness to depravity, corruption, and crime. It takes time to degrade those formed in the image of God to the brutal or the satanic. By beholding we become changed. By the indulgence of impure thoughts man can so educate his mind that sin which he once loathed will become pleasant to him.

    Satan is using every means to make crime and debasing vice popular. We cannot watch television, movies, some Internet sites, walk the streets of our cities without encountering flaring notices of crime all around as it is presented in some novel, or to be acted at some theater. The mind is educated to familiarity with sin. The course pursued by the base and vile is kept before the people in the periodicals of the day, and everything that can excite passion is brought before them in exciting stories. They hear and read so much of debasing crime that the once tender conscience, which would have recoiled with horror from such scenes, becomes hardened, and they dwell upon these things with greedy interest.

    Many of the amusements popular in the world today, even with those who claim to be Christians, tend to the same end as did those of the heathen. There are indeed few among them that Satan does not turn to account in destroying souls. Through the drama he has worked for ages to excite passion and glorify vice. The opera, with its fascinating display and bewildering music, the masquerade, the dance, the card table, gambling halls, bars, Satan employs to break down the barriers of principle and open the door to sensual indulgence. In every gathering for pleasure where pride is fostered or appetite indulged, where one is led to forget God and lose sight of eternal interests, there Satan is binding his chains about the soul (so let us be more discerning and careful.).

    "Keep thy heart with all diligence," is the counsel of the wise man; "for out of it are the issues of life." Proverbs 4:23. As man "thinketh in his heart, so is he." Proverbs 23:7. The heart must be renewed by divine grace, or it will be in vain to seek for purity of life. He who attempts to build up a noble, virtuous character independent of the grace of Christ is building his house upon the shifting sand. In the fierce storms of temptation it will surely be overthrown. David's prayer should be the petition of every soul: "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me." Psalm 51:10. And having become partakers of the heavenly gift, we are to go on unto perfection, being "kept by the power of God through faith." 1 Peter 1:5.

    Yet we have a work to do (a cooperative effort with God) to resist temptation. Those who would not fall a prey to Satan's devices must guard well the avenues of the soul; they must avoid

    1. reading,
    2. seeing,
    3. hearing,
    4. tasting, or
    5. smelling

    that which will suggest impure thoughts. The mind should not be left to wander at random upon every subject that the adversary of souls may suggest. "Girding up the loins of your mind," says the apostle Peter, "Be sober, . . . not fashioning yourselves according to your former lusts in . . . your ignorance: but like as He which called you is holy, be ye yourselves also holy in all manner of living." 1 Peter 1:13-15, R.V. Says Paul, "Whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things." Philippians 4:8. This will require earnest prayer and unceasing watchfulness. We must be aided by the abiding influence of the Holy Spirit, which will attract the mind upward, and habituate it to dwell on pure and holy things. And we must give diligent study to the word of God. "Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? by taking heed thereto according to Thy word." "Thy word," says the psalmist, "have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against Thee." Psalm 119:9, 11.

    Israel's sin at Beth-peor brought the judgments of God upon the nation, and though the same sins may not now be punished as speedily, they will as surely meet retribution. "If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy." 1 Corinthians 3:17. Nature has affixed terrible penalties to these crimes--penalties which, sooner or later, will be inflicted upon every transgressor. It is these sins more than any other that have caused the fearful degeneracy of our race, and the weight of disease and misery with which the world is cursed. Men may succeed in concealing their transgression from their fellow men, but they will no less surely reap the result, in suffering, disease, imbecility, or death. And beyond this life stands the tribunal of the judgment, with its award of eternal penalties. "They which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God," but with Satan and evil angels shall have their part in that "lake of fire" which "is the second death." Galatians 5:21; Revelation 20:14.

    "The lips of a strange woman drop as an honeycomb, and her mouth is smoother than oil: but her end is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword." Proverbs 5:3, 4. "Remove thy way far from her, and come not nigh the door of her house: lest thou give thine honor unto others, and thy years unto the cruel: lest strangers be filled with thy wealth; and thy labors be in the house of a stranger; and thou mourn at the last, when thy flesh and thy body are consumed." Verses 8-11. "Her house inclineth unto death." "None that go unto her return again." Proverbs 2:18, 19. "Her guests are in the depths of hell." Proverbs 9:18. {After PP 453 - 461.2}



    Notes & References

    [0100] `Stela of Kamose'; Ahmed Fakhri, `Bahriyah and Farafra', NY, 1974, p. 58.

    [0200] A damaged example of the hieroglyphic signs for `Avaris' (hut-waret) are found in `Archaeology', Jul/Aug 2001, p. 52. The fragment was found at Abydos, not in the eastern delta.

    [0300] Josephus, `Against Apion', Book I, Sec. 14.

    [0400] A. Gardiner, being more conservative and not thinking of this war as against the Hyksos occupiers of Egypt reads 3 years. But we tend to agree with 6 years especially since the rock city of Petra could have been Sharuhen and that location was definitely hard to take. But we don't assume that Petra looked then as it does today. See also P. Scott-Moncrieff, `The Royal Feud in the Wadi Halfa Temple' in PSBA, Dec. 1909, p. 333-338. Referrencing K. Sethe in `Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache', Vol. XLII, p. 136, where Sethe defends the reading of 3 years.

    [0500] There were two Ahmose, the first one who wrote the `Ahmose Inscription' was a commander in the army of the Ahmose, brother to Khamose, who became the first pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty. For your information: The grandmother of Ahmose I was `Tetisheri', the name of his wife was Ahmose-Nefertire, according to Ancient Egypt, Part 1, 1921, p. 14-16.

    [0600] Gardiner reads it as `three years'. See Kurt Sethe, `Die Dauer der Belagerung von Sharuhen', Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, XLVII, (1905), p. 136. Also Gunn & Gardiner in, `Journal of Egyptian Archaeology', Vol. V (1918),p. 47.

    [0700] Breasted, `Records', "Ahmose Inscription", Vol. II, Sec. 7-13. See also Archaeology, Jul/Aug 2001, S.Harvey, Tribute to a Conquering King, p. 52ff.; See also Omar Zhudi, `A Tale of Two Amoses - Or How to Begin an Empire' in KMT, Vol. 11, Winter 2000/01, p. 50-60; For a detail image of the Ahmose inscription see p. 59.

    [0800] The KJV translation of "in the valley," is incorrect. `Nakhal' is "a bed of a river," "a river," and more especially the "river of Egypt" or the wadi of el-Arish, as distinguished from Yeor, or the Nile. Levy, Wörterbuch über die Talmudin und Midrashim, translates `nakhal' as "Fluß, Bach, Flussbett [river, creek, river bed]."

    [0900] See Dr. Ewald Metzler, Conflict of Laws in the Israelite Dynasty of Egypt', p. 13.

    [1000] New research shows the following: The relevant part of A. Yahuda's discussion of "One" is p.13, section 6. Court expressions of deference. He shows that addressing Pharaoh in the 3rd person (as in the Joseph narrative) is most ancient, e.g. "his Majesty". We encounter that often. Then he goes on: "Very often out of respect to the king he was referred to simply as 'one' (tw); e.g. Urk. iv. 27. 10: ' why does "one" recall these things?', meaning the king: d'Orb, 12, 2f. (=Lit., 157): 'his Majesty loved her very much; one (iw.tw) appointed her as shepes.t (i.e. a 'freewoman, honorable, great lady')'; the same occurs again in other passages in the same narrative (compare also Lit., p. 50, n.1). This usage dates back to very ancient times and was always characteristic of official speech, as e.g. in the letter addressed in the name of King Phiops II (6th dynasty, about 2625-2475 BC) [sic] to General Herkhuf (hr-hwf) '... your letter to the king in the palace so that one (= the king) should know', &c. [Records, I, Sec.351; At this website we will modify our available information to reflect these identities and rely on the other identifications which bring the early Israelite kings together with the early 18th Dynasty kings as outlined in Here.]".

    [1050] F. Charles Fensham, Did a Treaty Exist between the Israelites and the Kenites? in BASOR, Oct 1964, p. 51-54; States the Kenites were the Midianites.

    [1100] Peter Warren, `Minoan Crete and Pharaohnic Egypt' in Egypt, the Aegean and the Levant, BM 1995.

    [1150] Ibid., p. 2.; See also: The Eg. example in Hayes 1953, 248; 1963-1934 BC, Kitchen 1989, 153.

    [1200] Manfred Gord, "Der Name `Kanaan' in Ägyptischer Wiedergabe', 1982, Biblische Notizen 18:26-27.

    [1300] Paul Ash, "The Relationship Between Egypt and Palestine During the Time of David and Solomon', Doctoral Dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta, 1998, pp. 64-66.

    [1350] The word `Amu' appears in Egypt's records as `mw', read as `Amu', but rendered by Breasted as Asiatics. [Breasted, `Records', Vol. II, Sec. 303.]

    [1400] A. Gardiner, `The Defeat of the Hyksos by Kamose' in JEA, Vol. III, 1916, p. 95-110.; For the large scale image of the Carnarvon Tablet turn to page 96,97.

    [1500] For a color image of a bronze dagger with a silver grip and gold covered pommel, found in the coffin of Khamose see N.Reeves, Ancient Egypt and the Great Discoveris, p. 47.

    [1600] For an image of the black granite statue of Isis with the facial features of Queen Tiye see KMT, Spring 2004, Vol. 15, p. 36. See also KMT, Summer 2004, p. 43.

    Notice this account: "In 1892 the Palestine Exploration Fund were excavating at Lachish, the Amorite city whence Zimrida wrote his dispatch, and where he must have dictated and received many others. Among various small relics their explorer, Dr. Bliss, found and Egyptian ornament bearing the name of Queen Tii, wife of Amenophis II, father of the king to whom Zimrida's dispatch, now at Berlin, was sent, and far more fortunate than this, a clay tablet turned up similar to these from Tel Amarna, having the same peculiar idioms as did those of that collection emanating from Southern Palestine, and the same forms of cuneiform letters, and bearing twice upon it the name of Zimrida himself."[PBSA, Vol. XIX, p. 24.]

    [1650] F.J. Giles, `Ikhnaton - legend and history', p. 66ff.

    [1700] Lisa Manniche, `City of the Dead', Theban Tombs and Owners; See also, Davis N. de Garis 'The Tombs of Menkheperrasonb, Amenmose and EES Theban Tomb Series', Fifth Memoir, London 1933, p 35-40, pl. XXX, E.

    [1800] See Barry Kemp, `Discovery & Renewal at Amarna', Egyptian Archaeology, Summer 1991, p. 19-22 & and the streets of El Am. in No. 4, 1994, p. 39.; Donald B. Redford, `The Monotheism of the Heretic Pharaoh' in BAR, Vol. XIII, May/Jun 1987, p. 16-(24)-32.

    [1825] On the subject of cult objects on stone blocks from the Aton Temple at Thebes, Egypt, see Sayed Tawfik, `Aton Studies' in MDAI, Band 35, 1979, p. 335-344. Much of it is on the nmst jars. For the painted picture of Akhenaten's jubilee processional which was celebrated every five years in Thebes see BAR, May/June 1987, p. 21.

    [1850] Peter Clayton, `Chronicle of the Pharaohs', p. 130. Kiya was also the sister of the Mitannian king `Tushratta'.

    [1900] See KMT, `Spacious and Comfortable Dwellings: Homes of the Nobles at Akhetaten', Vol. 10, Summer 1999, p. 66-79. For B&W images of a scenes from the tomb of Nakht, see BA, June 1987, p. 75.

    [2000] For images of the tomb and its art work see National Geographic, November 2003, p. 52-59.

    [2100] R.Parkinson & L.Schofield, `Images of Mycenaeans in Egypt, the Aegean and the Levant, BM 1995, p. 125-126.

    [2200] Yuya, a Semite, was a vizier in the days of Thutmose IV and Amenhotep III. He is another example that foreigners could reach high positions in Egypt. As such he, like Senmut and Thutmose I/King David(?), may not have lived in Egypt but only visited there or accomplished his work by proxy servants of his choosing. His prestige and standing earned him a tomb where archaeologists read his title, `ntr-n-nb tawi' (Holy father of the Lord of the Two Lands). Both, Tiy and her brother Anen, Chancellor of the King, Second Prophet of Amun, Sem-priest of Heliopolis, and Divine Father, were powerful personalities. Since Yuya's daughter Tiy was married to Amenhotep III, he, in effect, fathered a pharaoh, Amenhotep IV/Akhnaton.; See also E.R. Ayrton, `The Tomb of Thyi' in PSBA, Vol. XXIX, 1907, p. 85-86; Also p. 277-281 showing in B&W 4 lids of canopic jars with a female head, Tuya's gold head-dress, and the tomb entrance.

    For images of Yuya's mummy mask see KMT, Summer 1996, p. 40-45 and Susan E. James, `Who is the Elder Lady?' in KMT, Summer 2001, p. 42-(46)-50. Features also a side view of Yuya and Tuya comparing her with Nefertiti.

    [2300] N. Reeves & R. Wilkinson, `The Complete Valley of the Kings', p. 78.

    Neferneferuaten [2320] The form of names of this royal personality includes Ankhkheperure (`beloved of Uanre'), Smenkhare Djeserkheperu (on the Meryre II tomb relief), Ankhkheperure and Nefernefruaten. [F.J. Giles, Ikhnaton, p. 98.; KMT, Vol. 20, No. 3, Fall 2009, p. 41-49.]

    [2350] For the Tell Borg report search Google `tell borg report by James K. Hoffmeier'. List of finds: A ring with the seal of Queen Tiye, Aegean, Cypriote and Canaanite ceramics, faunal remains, a bronze arrow and a 64 cm long lance, the nomen of Ramesses II, `rc mss sw mry imn'.

    [2400] W.J. Murnane, `Texts from the Amarna Period in Egypt', (1995), p. 210-211; [See also, James P. Allen, `JARCE', Vol. XXV (1988), pp. 117-126; and Cairo Museum - Gold Foils of KV55 in KMT, Summer 2001, p. 19.]

    [2500] A. Zivie, `Mystery of the Sun God's Servants', National Geographic, Nov 2003, p. 52-59; The article features numerous images as well as a schematic view of the tomb.

    [2550] For a larger image of the bark of Ay as painted in his tomb see Peter F. Dorman, `Creation of the Potters Wheel at the Eastern Horizon of Heaven' in Emily Teeter & John A. Larson, `Gold of Praise', 1999, p. 83-(93)-99.

    [2600] R.W. Rogers, `Cuneiform Parallels to the Old Testament', p. 257.

    [2700] A. Erman translated `weba' as forecourt even though the word is written with the sign of an eye. Not being prepared to consider that Akhnaton may have become blind explained: "The buildings of the heretic, in particular el-Amarna." As V. wrote: "All the world is in sunlight, the world of one man is dark: this is the meaning of the sentence, and "sight" is here intended by the use of the hieroglyph with a human eye." Heresy may be defined as a distortion of the truth, an over-emphasize of one part to the neglect of another important part where the track of truth lies close beside the track of error, and both tracks may seem to be one to minds which are not deeply acquainted with the Bible, and which, therefore, are not quick to discern the difference between truth and error.

    [2800] A. Erman, `The Literature of the Ancient Egyptian', (1927), pp. 309-310.

    [2900] J.H. Breasted, `The Dawn of Conscience' (1933), p. 307.

    [3000] Carter suggested once: "It is quite possible that he (Smenkhare) met his death at the hands of a rival faction. ... It is quite unprecedented in the valley to find the name of a succeeding king upon the walls of his predecessor's sepulchral monument. The fact that it was so in this case seems to imply a special relationship between the two, and we shall probably be safe in assuming that it was Ay who was largely responsible for establishing the boy king upon the throne. Quite possibly he had designs upon it himself already, but, not feeling secure enough for the moment, preferred to bid his time and utilize the opportunities he would undoubtedly have as minister to a young and inexperienced sovereign, to consolidate his position." Carter and Mace, `The Tomb of Tut-ankh-Amen', Vol. I, p. 43-44.

    [3100] In more recent times a British team re-excavated this area and today archaeologists tend to think that the canopic jars belonged once to Kiya, a minor wife of Akhnaton. So far we have not found the logic on why Kiya was chosen. It appears they also re-excavated the `Pit Tomb' and classified it as a storage area. But this is of course an interpretative assumption which in fact does not seem to take into account the other subtle clues which we present, i.e. the woven fabrics with the embroidered names, animal bones, and clues of habitation within the pit tomb.

    [3150] A full page photo of the head and upper torso of Tiye as carved into the side of the fallen colossus of Memnon/Amenhotep III at Kom el Hettan can be seen in KMT, Fall 2003, p. 21.- - The plan, the statue images and images of the whole area can be seen in KMT, Vol. 14, No. 1, Spring 2003, p. 34-43.

    [3200] P.E. Newberry, `King Ay, the Successor of Tut-ankh-amun' Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. XVIII (1932), pp. 50-52.

    [3300] Weigall, `The Life and Times of Akhnaton' Aldred, `Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, Vol. XLIII (1957).

    [3400] Breasted, `A History of Egypt', p.394.

    [3500] G. Steindorff, `Die Grabkammer des Tutankhamun', Annales du Services des Antiquiés de l'Egypte, Vol. XXXVIII (1938), p. 667. In the tomb of Tutankhamun was also found a box decorated with painted scenes from the life of the king and showing him with Ankhesenpaaten, later Ankhesenamun. [Ancient Egypt, Jun 2007, p. 20. The issue shows also `Ta-irty-bay', the old woman of Akhmim, p. 30f.]

    [3550] F.J. Giles, Ikhnaton, p. 103. For the coffin image see P. Clayton, Chronicle of the Pharaohs, p. 127. According to Giles, inside the coffin was a piece of gold leafe bearing the epithet, `beloved of Uanre', a title, which he says appears only in the name of Smenkhare.

    [3600] Memoirs of H.E. Winlock, Materials used at the Embalming of King Tut-ankh-Amun, Metropolitan Museum of Art Papers, No. 10 (1941).

    [3700] See Nicholas Reeves, `The Complete Tutankhamun', p. 53, 93.

    [3800] Richard Lepsius, `Denkmäler', p. 245.

    [3900] F.W. von Bissig, `Das Grab des Petamenophis in Theben', Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumsurkunde, Vol. LXXIV (1938), p.2; R. Anthes in `Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache', Vol. 73 (1937), p. 30f.

    [4000] A.M.Blackman, `The Stela of Shoshenk, Gret Chief of the Meshwesh' in JEA, Vol. 27, 1941, p. 83-95.

    [4100] `Bulletin' of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Sec. II, February 1928, p. 46, figs. 48, 51.

    [4200] Pritchard, `Records', Pl. 41.

    [4500] Here is a solemn warning for the people of God today, to allow no unchristian trait to live in their hearts. A sin which is fostered becomes habitual; and, strengthened by repetition, it soon exerts a controlling influence, bringing into subjection all the nobler powers. Balaam loved the reward of unrighteousness. The sin of covetousness, which God ranks with idolatry, he did not resist and overcome. Satan obtained entire control of him through this one fault, which deteriorated his character, and made him a time-server. He called God his master; but he did not serve Him; he did not work the works of God. (ST Nov. 18, 1880){1BC 1116.6}
    `Coveteousness' (10th commandment) for many is a form of idolatry, it may include a strong desire for things like cars, televisions, electronics, toys above regard for God today. -- Two hundred years ago perhaps, it had to do with horses, wagons, etc.; and 3000 years ago, donkeys, cloths, metal wares, etc. It often is things one wants but cannot really afford to purchase, or if they are purchased at the price of other, perhaps more important items for the family.

    [4800] Names like: (1) Baal-gad, the lord of fortune (Josh. 11:17; 12:7; (2) Baal-hamon, the lord of a multitude Song of Sol. 8:11; (3) Baal-hazor, enclosure (2.Sam. 13:23); (4) Baal-meon, lord of the house (Num. 32:38; Ez. 25:9; Jer. 48:23); (5) Bamoth-baal, high places (Num. 21:19); (6) Beth-Aven, house of idols (Josh. 7:2; 18:12; 1.Sam. 13:5); (7) Beth-dagon, house of Dagon (Josh. 19:27); (8) Beth-diblathaim, house of fig cakes (Jer. 48:21,22); (9) Beth-shemesh, house of the sun (Josh. 15:10; 19:38; Judg. 1:33).

    [5000] We may say, the experience of America is similar: (1) The Civil War because of the sin of slavery; (2) Vietnam because of allowing being seduced by Babylon to start it; (3) Iraq, because of quickly mounting sins among leaders and in the nation generally, etc.

    [5200] Shittim was the final Israelite encampment before crossing the Jordan River. Here Moses bade farewell and the nations Law was completed, Num. 25:1; Josh. 2:1. It was a dry and unfruitful valley, Joel 3:18.



    Bible Topics Main Menu Previous Vultures aboveAbove Jellyfish belowBelow Next Submenu
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .