|
Original Documents
|
| Al's Menu | Home | Addtopics | Submenu |
|
The Book of Daniel and The Fall of Babylon
|
|
Nxt: Test by Fire Jmp: Fall of Babylon |
Daniel in Babylon - The City |
Notes & References |
Prevs: Our Only Safety |
The Book of daniel is really a book of greater depth and significance than we may suspect. In the very first chapter we are confronted with the upbringing of Daniel from his youth based on the principles he upheld, for these are the determining factors on how he decided three possible conflicting events.
The answer to the first two items can be found in the words where it says, "Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it." Prov. 22:6. And, "Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not, nor the years draw nigh, when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them." Eccl. 12:1. On the matter of education and name, the Hebrew youth had no problem, because their character was set from an early age on to trust in the Lord only. We see that the name did not affect Daniel because we read several times during his courier, "I Daniel" (Dan. 7:15; 8:2,15; 9:2). But on the matter of diet, that would affect their bodily, as well as their spiritual health, and they sought a change in that (Ex. 16:32-34; 5:1,2), so they could maintain these according to divine principles on health which the Egyptians understood not - how the mind can be influenced by how we eat, "Two things have I required of thee; deny me them not before I die: Remove far from me vanity and lies: give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: Lest I be full (over eat), and deny thee (overeating leads to this), and say, Who is the LORD? or lest I be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain." Prov. 30:7-9. To `be full', have a `growling' body, means to overeat. The studied the effects of overeating confirm that they influence changes in the brain,
A healthy body knows, "For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." Lev. 17:11. We know that some don't head such health talk. Some believe there is ..., "A time to be born, and a time to die." Eccl. 3:2a. But when we would continue reading, we would find these words, "Be not over much wicked, neither be thou foolish: why shouldest thou die before thy time?" Eccl. 7:17, which ought to lead us to not stop and base all our conclusions on Eccl. 3:2. "As the storm approaches, a large class who have professed faith in the third angel's message, but have not been sanctified through obedience to the truth, abandon their position and join the ranks of the opposition. By uniting with the world and partaking of its spirit, they have come to view matters in nearly the same light; and when the test is brought, they are prepared to choose the easy, popular side. Men of talent and pleasing address, who once rejoiced in the truth, employ their powers to deceive and mislead souls. They become the most bitter enemies of their former brethren. When Sabbathkeepers are brought before the courts to answer for their faith, these apostates are the most efficient agents of Satan to misrepresent and accuse them, and by false reports and insinuations to stir up the rulers against them." {GC 608.2} What was the matter with the dream King Nebuchadnezzar had? Should we regard dreams as of any importance? Probably only such dreams are noteworthy through which God is trying to reach us and/or impress us with a message from Him. And so it was that the king had a dream one night when he lay awake in bed, contemplating the future; however, when he woke up he could not remember the dream. All he knew was, he had a very impressive dream, but try as he might, he could not recall it. So, he called upon his wise men, priests and soothsayers to tell him the dream. Their reaction was to call a conclave for all of the members of their rank, to discover who among them might be able to have the answer, but no one came forward. Up until this time the king had no reason to doubt the claims of his advisers, fortunetellers and magicians. Little did he realize that he was surrounded by state compensated, government sanctioned con-men.
2:3 "And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream. Why did Babylon's wise men fail? Because man is only man. We have no knowledge what the person next to us may think. All we can do is make a guess. So, Satan, too, cannot read our mind. He can only plant a thought and then from his long store house of experience make educated guesses what we think and how we probably react.
33:14 "For God speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not. In the Book of Job we certainly read that people believed dreams could reveal things to man. But for Nebuchadnezzar the matter was serious, for these wise men had claimed all along that they could do such a thing as to reveal the meaning of dreams. For Daniel and his three friends things were serious, for they were counted among those, who the king now threatened with death.
2:17 "Then Daniel went to his house, and made the thing known to Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, his companions: The Lord was working in the Babylonian kingdom, communicating light to the four Hebrew captives, that He might represent His work before the people through them. He would reveal that He had power over the kingdoms of the world, to set up kings and to throw down kings. The King over all kings was communicating great truths to the king of Babylon, awakening in his mind a sense of his responsibility to God. Nebuchadnezzar was to see the contrast between the wisdom of God and the wisdom of the most learned men in his kingdom. [FE 411.2]
"Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will show unto the king the interpretation. Then Arioch brought in Daniel before the king in haste, and said thus unto him, I have found a man of the captives of Judah, that will make known unto the king the interpretation." Daniel 2:24,25. The issues were stated clearly by the king. `Tell me the dream or else.' But Daniel had implicit faith in God, that he and his friends would pray, and God would reveal to them the dream He gave the highest ruler of the then known world. Daniel sought the Lord when the decree went forth to slay all the wise men of the kingdom of Babylon, because they could not relate or interpret the dream, which had gone from the king's mind. Nebuchadnezzar demanded not only the interpretation of the dream, but the relation of the dream itself. . . . They declared that the request of the king was. . . beyond that which had ever been required of any man. The king became furious, and acted like all men who have great power and uncontrollable passions. He decided that every one of them should be put to death, and as Daniel and his fellows were numbered with the wise men, they also were to share this fate. Daniel was imbued with the spirit of Jesus Christ, and he pleaded in prayer, that the wise men of Babylon should not be destroyed. For you see, the followers of Christ do not possess the attributes of Satan, which make it a pleasure to grieve and afflict the creatures of God. They have the spirit of their Master who said, "I am come to seek and to save that which was lost. I came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance." Had Daniel possessed the same quality of religious zeal, which is so quickly inflamed today in the churches, and men are led astray by it to afflict and oppress and destroy those, who do not serve God after His prescribed plan, he would have said to Arioch, "These men who claim to be wise men, are deceiving the king. They have not the knowledge they claim to have, and should be destroyed. They dishonor the God of heaven, they serve idols; and their lives do in no way honor to God; let them die; but bring me in before the king and I will show unto the king the interpretation." {CC 251.2,3} Daniel was just a man like you and I, but his relationship to God made him great because of his faith in God, which was revealed as he pleaded for the wise men. What was the price? We ought to know that the wicked owe their present existence to God's faithful people, that is the meaning of what we just read. [See also Dan. 2:26-30] This young Judean lad, refused to take honor and glory which belongs to God alone, and we wished, that today more people would realize that truth.
"Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil." Eccl. 8:11. "Consider the experience of Daniel. When called to stand before King Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel did not hesitate to acknowledge the source of his wisdom. Did that faithful recognition of God detract from Daniel's influence in the king's court? By no means; it was the secret of his power; it secured for him favor in the eyes of the ruler of Babylon. In God's name Daniel made known to the king the heaven-sent messages of instruction, warning, and rebuke, and he was not repulsed. Let God's workers of today read the firm, bold testimony of Daniel and follow his example." [7T 151.3] What was Nebuchadnezzar's reaction? He became excited in anticipation, to finally find out what he had dreamt that night quite a while ago, and which dream so impressed him so much, that he left no way untried, to find out what it was. What again was Nebuchadnezzar's dream? See Daniel 2:31-35. Why did God show the king an image? Because Babylonian idolatry dealt much with pagan images instead of seeking a religion for the heart. Their culture and cities were geared to worship man made gods. The Babylon of the days of Daniel did certainly fall. Those days, too, were the days of Babylon's highest splendor and greatest glory. Yet that was the time she fell. This fall was foretold over and over in the word of the Lord by his prophets; it was proclaimed in Babylon by the public reading there of the word of the Lord concerning Babylon; all who were the Lord's people, or who would be the Lord's people, were called to leave Babylon, that they might not be taken in her fall; signs were given by which all might certainly know when to forsake her, and how she would be overthrown. All this was made plain to all by the word of the Lord.
|
|
Belshazar Chart |
Isaiah (ca. 740 - 690 BC) proclaimed the message of a vision declared unto him, in which Elam and Media were to go up and the siege; and in a "night of pleasure," of eating and drinking, the watchman would cry,
"Babylon is fallen, is fallen; and all the graven images of her gods he hath broken unto the ground." Isa. 21:1-10. The same prophet also wrote to her of her pride and her wickedness, saying: "Therefore shall evil come upon thee; thou shalt not know from whence it riseth: and mischief shall fall upon thee: thou shall not be able to put it off: and desolation shall come upon thee, which thou shalt not know." Isa. 47:11. This more general message of the future of Babylon, was more closely identified by the words, "Thus saith the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut." Isa. 45:1. Thus Isaiah wrote plainly the name of the man—Cyrus—(some hundred and sixty years before Jeremiah), who would lead the forces in the overthrow of the city. Isa. 45:1-7. He also wrote, "Go ye forth of Babylon, flee ye from the Chaldeans, with a voice of singing declare ye, tell this, utter it even to the end of the earth; say ye, The Lord hath redeemed the servant Jacob." Isa. 48:20. In Jeremiah 50 and 51 is written "the word that the Lord spake against Babylon and against the land of the Chaldeans by Jeremiah the prophet." Jer. 50:1. In these two chapters there is given an account, even to [its] particulars, of the fall of Babylon written more than half a century before the time. This account was sent to Babylon by a prince of Judah, who, when he arrived there, was to stand in the broad street of Babylon by the river Euphrates, and "read all these words." And when he had read the words, he was to have exclaimed, "O Lord, thou hast spoken against this place, to cut it off, that none shall remain in it, neither man nor beast, but that it shall be desolate for ever." And when he had spoken these words, he was to bind a stone to the manuscript, and cast it into the midst of Euphrates, and say, "Thus shall Babylon sink, and shall not rise from the evil that I will bring upon her." Jer. 51:64. And all that the Lord had spoken, and that the prophets had written, came upon Babylon. Babylon did fall. In her iniquity she fell, and because of her iniquity she fell. And this, not because it could not have been otherwise, but because she would not have it otherwise. For the Lord would have healed Babylon; but she would not be healed. His people were there for that very purpose; but when she would not be healed, they were obliged to forsake her, and go everyone to his own country; for her judgment reached unto heaven, and was lifted up even to the skies, "Foreigners (the Jews) living there said, We tried to help Babylonia, but it was too late. Lets leave now and go back home. God has punished Babylonia with all his might and has destroyed it completely.", Jer. 51:9 GNB. So Babylon was left to her fate, and sank to rise no more at all. So much for the Babylon of the book of Daniel and of the days of Daniel. But now there is a Babylon of the book of Revelation, and of our days—the last days. What means the Bible word [to say] concerning a Babylon of the last book of the Bible and of the last days? What does it mean unless it be that the world of the last times is to become like the Babylon of those other days, and is to come to the same end as did the Babylon of those other days? If that is not the lesson in it, then there is no lesson in it. The term "Babylon," written so often in the book of Revelation, and of the last times, is meaningless if it does not mean that the last days, and the world of the last days, will be such as was Babylon in her last days. Why was the fall [of] Babylon proclaimed in old time? and why is the fall Babylon proclaimed in the last times? [300] Why, unless there is to be a Babylon to fall in the last times as certainly as there was a Babylon in old time to fall? Why was the judgment of God to be visited upon Babylon in old time? and why is the judgment of God to be visited upon a Babylon of the last times? [320] Why, unless there is to be a Babylon in the last times as certainly as there was a Babylon in old time? Why were the Lord's people called out of the Babylon of old time? and why are the Lord's people called out of the Babylon of the last times? Jer. 51:6, 45; Rev. 18:4. Why, unless the Babylon of the last times terms herself in iniquity as did the Babylon of old time? Why was it that the messenger in Babylon of old time ended his message by casting a stone into the midst of Euphrates, and exclaiming, "Thus shall Babylon sink, and shall not rise from the evil that I will bring upon her," Jer. 51:61-64? And why is it that, at the close of the message concerning the Babylon of the last times, a mighty angel takes up "a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall the great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all." Rev. 18:21. Why, unless there is to be a Babylon in the last times to sink, and that [it] will sink, as certainly as there was a Babylon of old time to sink, and that [city] did sink? Why was it that, at the noise of the fall of the Babylon of old time, the earth was moved, and the cry was heard among the nations? And why is it that, at the fall of the Babylon of the last times, "the kings of the earth. . . bewail her, and lament for her," and that their cry is heard among the nations? Jer. 50:46; Rev. 18:9, 10, 15-19. Why [is that recorded], unless the judgment upon the Babylon of the last times is just as real and as terrible as was that upon the Babylon of old time? Why was it that when the Babylon of old time fell, so at [Revelation's] Babylon there fall also the slain of all the earth? And why is it that when the Babylon of the last times falls, there is found in her "the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth?" Jer. 51:49; Rev. 18:24. Why, unless the Babylon of the last times is just as wicked, just as cruel, and just as impressive, as was the Babylon of old time? Why was it that when Babylon of old time fell, the heaven and earth, and all that was therein, were called to "sing for Babylon?" And why is it that when the Babylon of the last times shall fall, the word will be, "Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets?" Jer. 51:48; Rev. 18:20. Why, unless it is a thing to rejoice [for] heaven and earth to be freed from the curse of the Babylon of the last times as readily as it was of the Babylon of old time? But why call attention to any more parallels? Is it not perfectly plain that there is a Babylon of the last times that is a complete repetition of the Babylon of old time? Is there not a real Babylon in the book of Revelation just as there is a Babylon in the book of Daniel? Is there not a Babylon of our days as real as there was in the days of Daniel? And is not this Babylon of the last days to sink under the judgments of the Lord as really as did the Babylon of old? When that judgment was written for the Babylon of old, was it not at the same time written: "This is the purpose that is purposed upon the earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all nations. For the Lord of hosts hath purposed and to shall disannul it? and his hand is stretched out, and to shall turn it back?" Isa. 14:26, 27. Why talk then about a millennium—unless, indeed, it [shall] be a millennium of ruin and waste in this [time] and desolation? Did Babylon of old have a millennium of any other kind than of ruin, waste and desolation, swept "with the bosom of destruction," "a possession for the bittern (a type of wetland bird) and pools of water," "as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah?" Isa. 13:19; 14:22, 23; Jer. 50:40. Why talk then about the conversion of the world? Was the Babylonian world of old time converted? Did she sink because she was converted?—She would not be converted. She sank because she was overwhelmingly wicked. And the Babylon of the last times is just like her. And thus with violence shall Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all. "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached and the heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." {A.T. Jones (1850-1923), Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, June 14, 1898, p. 381.1-8} [400] Notes & References [CIAS: We adjusted some grammar in [] to make it easier to read.] [300] The Fall of Babylon in Today's Iraq by the Medo-Persians in 538 BC: "And, behold, here cometh a chariot of men, with a couple of horsemen. And he answered and said, Babylon is fallen, is fallen; and all the graven images of her gods he hath broken unto the ground." Isa. 21:9;
Jeremiah 51:8 "Babylon is suddenly fallen and destroyed:
"And there followed another angel, saying, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city, because she made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication." Rev. 14:8;
[320] "The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of Amoz did see.
Isaiah 47:5 "Sit thou silent, and get thee into darkness, O daughter of the Chaldeans: for thou shalt no more be called, The lady of kingdoms. . . .
Jeremiah 50:9 "For, lo, I will raise and cause to come up
"And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters. . . .
Revelation 18:6 "Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her double. [400] Last remarks. A simple, yet effective view. In comparison I read some detailed theological presentations on Daniel chapter eight, dealing with gender, pronouns, verbs and nouns in quite some detail. What was the outcome? The one who thought who did the most detailed analysis, came out to give pagan Rome more verses in chapter eight (vs. 9 and onward), then the papacy. Pagan Rome which ruled between 168 BC to 478 AD, some 656 years compared to papal Rome, ruling from 538 to 1798 and then again from 1798 till the very end, got most of the credit. That seems upside down. So, these prophetic books confound the theologians while the simple can read it and understand. |