|
Original Historical Documents
|
| The Assyrian Connections |
|
The Limmu King Lists
For an image of a tablet containing the eponymate of Bur-sagale see Baruch Halpern, `Eyewitness Testimony' in BAR, Vol. 29, Sep/Oct 2003, p. 50-(52)-57.
|
With the aid of the limmu lists and solar eclipses today's historians assure us that absolute dates can be calculated for Assyrian kings. Such ascertations require a closer look and several dissenting views can be read in various publications. We also shall address some details of the Assyrian king list. According to the limmu list Assuruballit was the son of Eriba-Adad, but Assuruballit of the EA letters (#15,16) was the son of Assur-nadin-ahe. This is what historians have said:
|
| In Section 60, Luckenbill presents another list by Assuruballit of his ancestors where again there is no mention of Assur-nadin-ahe. |
|
Assur-ubalit, viceroy of Assur Iriba-Adad, viceroy of Assur Assur-bel-nisheshu Assur-nirari ... |
son of Iriba-Adad son of Assur-bel-nisheshu son of Assur-nirari [0200] |
| Another useful quotation on Assyrian multiple kingships is this one: "[To] Ashur-nirari and Ili-Hard[da...], kings of Assyria, speak! [The words of] Adad-shumua-usur, great king, strong king, [king of the universe], king of Karduniash, ... etc." [0300]
As to the Assurubalit problem: |
|
Were Assuruballit and Amenophis IV Contemporary Kings? - For the latest info on this click Here! In 1917 Weidner admitted `The dates we have established for the Assyrian and Babylonian kings do not fit those established by Egyptian historians for the dates of the Egyptian kings.' [0400]
As a consequence both chronologies, the Egyptian and Assyrian periods needed to be shifted. The EA period was moved back into the 15th century BC. Professor Mahler required placing Amenhotep III at the end of the 15th century and Akhnaton from 1403-1391 BC. This was far too high by the standards of the next generation of chronologists. What first led to raising the age of Amenhotep III into the 15th century, now required lowering it due to Poebel's Khorsabad List, 1942/43, which `proved' that all previous chronologies were too high and the age of the Assyrian kings had to be lowered by some 64 years. However, to lower the reign of Akhnaton enough, in order to make him a contemporary of Assurubalit, was impossible because conventional Egyptian chronology is built on the assumption that Ramses I started to reign in 1322 a few decades ago and now in 1293 BC. Before Ramses I, Tutankhamen, Smenkhare, Aye and Horemheb must have reigned according to their chronology. Even today, Assurubalit and Akhnaton cannot be shown to have been contemporaries. Assyrian chronology is dependent on Egyptian chronology and therefore cannot be used as proof of its validity. |
|
Burraburias to Amenophis IV - Typical wording: EA#6: Thus says Burraburias, king .., your brother.. Whatever you desire in my land ... may it be brought to you.. Whatever I desire in your land ... may it be brought to me.. EA#8: In your (vassal land Kinahhi) land I have been violently dealt with ... kill them and avenge my servants.. |
Asuruballit to Amenophis IV - typical wording: EA#15,16: To the king of Egypt, say. Thus says Asurubalit, your brother ... with you, your house, your wives ... may it be well ... Why should messengers remain in foreign lands, and the king profits from that, then they remain ... and die.. |
Until recently, it appears to us that Assuruballit was most likely a provincial prince, or a pretender to the crown of Assyria. In a later age we find a prince Assuruballit installed by his brother Assurbanipal as the governor of the Harran province. Now we lean toward identifying this Assurubalit as Aziru/ Hazael/ Kurtiwaza, Syrian rulers in the day of Shalmaneser III/ Burraburiash. |
|
"Now as to the Assyrians, my subjects, have I not written thee? So is the situation! Why have they come into the land? If thou lovest me, they should not carry on any business. Let them accomplish nothing." [EA#9, lines 31-35] |
|
In other words, business was carried on without his approval, behind his back. Such business had a leader who was in a position to procure goods and in those days that must have been a person of some distinction. By implication a member of `the' or `a' royal family must have been behind it, perhaps the Syrian Hazael. Therefore, limmu lists may not be entirely taking account of all personalities which had some impact on events not known to the limmu list compilers and we ought to refrain from calling this Asuruballit the first since we really don't know that; similarly we probably also ought to refrain from referring to Assyrian limmu lists as providing absolute dates. Archaeological Evidence Not to repeat ourselves click here for the account of this. And so it is that Burraburiash/Shalmaneser III emerges as a contemporary of Akhnaton and the El Amarna Age. To this we could add the list of Amarna correspondents already posted here or here. Part II Within the context of this website we would like to present the history of Assyria as it interacts with Palestine and Egypt during the period from about 735-688 BC in order to pin down chronological relationships with other countries it came in contact with. There can be no relevant discussion of topics on the religion, legal documents, writing, etc. of Assyria in a meaningful way until the chronological synchronisms are established. The same is true with all other countries. Mismatching ancient, influential people and events will lead to distortions and inaccuracies in representing the ancient past. In the case of Assyria the shift is not as dramatic as with Egyptian history. The main changes have to do with a divergent Egyptian background which Assyrian history and written sources help support. Assyrian texts make references to kings and places in Palestine, Judah, Israel and Egypt which we need to explore for they may represent important historical links. Rezin, the last king of Damscus, is called in these annals, Rasunnu of Aram; Menahem is called Menihimmu of Samerina (Samaria); Both of these pay tribute in about 742 BC, to Tiglath-Pileser III, as do also the rulers of Tyre, Gebal (Byblos), Carchemish (Qarqar), Hamath etc. His annals also mention Aziriyau of Yaudu (or Yaudi) who has been interpreted to be Azariah (783-742 BC) of Judah. |
| Late Period Assyrian Kings (conventional list) | Kings of Mesopotamia/Mitanni/Damascus |
|
Adad-Nirari II Tukulti-Ninurta II Ashurnasirpal II Shalmaneser III Shamshi-Adad V Shamiram Adad-Nirari Shalmaneser IV Ashur-Dan III Ashur-Nirari V Tiglath-Pileser III (Pul) Shalmaneser V Sargon II/Sennacherib Esarhaddon Ashurbanipal Ashur-Etel-Ilani Sin-shar-Ishkun Ashur-uballit II |
911 - 891 (20 yrs) 890 - 884 (6 yrs) 883 - 859 (24 yrs) 858 - 824 (34 yrs) 823 - 811 (12 yrs) 811 - 806 (05 yrs) 806 - 783 (23 yrs) 782 - 773 (09 yrs) 772 - 755 (17 yrs) 754 - 745 (09 yrs) 744 - 727 (17 yrs) 726 - 722 (04 yrs) 721 - 705 / 704 - 681 (39 yrs) 680 - 669 (11 yrs) 668 - 627 (41 yrs) 627 - 624 (03 yrs) 623 - 612 (11 yrs) 612 - ? |
Shamsi-Adad/Hadadezer Hammurabi Zimrilim/Rezon Shamsuiluna Abu-eshuh (reading uncertain)
|
|
Pekah (~735-732) and Rezin invaded Judah and besieged Jerusalem - 2.Kings 16:5; Isaiah 7:1-9 while Tiglath-Pileser was on a campaign in Urartu in Armenia (737-735). In desperation Ahaz dispatched for help to Tiglath-Pileser (2.Kings 16:7-8). In an inscription recording payment of tribute by various vassal states of Syria-Palestine, including the kings of Hamath, Arvad, Moab, Gaza, Ashkelon, Edom, and others, also "Iauhazi [Jehoahaz, i.e., Ahaz] of Judah" is mentioned. This tribute consisted of"gold, silver, lead, iron, tin, brightly colored woolen garments, linen, the purple garments of their lands... all kinds of costly things, the products of the sea and the dry land ... the royal treasure, horses [450], mules, broken to the yoke..."
The name `Jehoahaz' means `The One Who Possesses Yahweh', and was the more formal name used by the Assyrians. The people of Judah considered this name to be inappropriate for someone worshipping idols and called him simply `Ahaz', `One Who Possesses'. Ahaz bent toward paganism is illustrated by his importation of the type of altar he saw when he went to pay homage to Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus - 2.Kings 16:10-16. [0500]
When Pekah was assassinated, the Assyrian emperor placed Hoshea on the throne, 2.Kings 15:30, obligating him to pay heavy tribute to Assyria. This also was duly recorded in the Assyrian inscriptions,
"Paqaha [Pekah] their king, they deposed and I placed Ausi' [Hoshea] over them as king. 10 talents of gold....talents of silver, as their tribute I received from them and to Assyria I carried them." T.P. died in -727.
At the time of the fall of Samaria, not only did Egypt lose all of its remaining influence in Asia - its last Libyan rulers were themselves compelled to submit to Assyrian overlordship. In the 7th year of Sargon "Pir'u, the king of Musru" (Pharaoh of Egypt) is listed among those sending tribute to Assyria. The conquest of Egypt had been carried out with iron weapons and Assyrian tools made of iron were found in Egypt. [Petrie, `Ancient Egypt', Vol. II (1915), p. 22; also Petrie, `Six Temples at Thebes', 1896, p. 18f] Later in that same year a certain `Iamani' seized power in Ashdod, an independent principality next to Judah on the coast; trying to organize an anti-Assyrian league and to enroll the help of Egypt, Sargon recounts in his annals,
"... sent bribes to Pir'u king of Musru, a potentate incapable to save him...and asked him to be an ally."
The rebellious prince tried also to involve Judah (Ia-u- di) in the conspiracy: but Hezekiah, probably at Isaiah's urging (Isaiah 7), refused to risk the nations future on so doubtful a venture. Informed of Iamani's revolt, Sargon gathered chosen troops and sent them against the rebel: "In a sudden rage I marched quickly...against Ashdod, his royal residence."
Without Egyptian help, along with other towns on the Philistine coast, Iamani "fled into the territory of Musru [Egypt] which belongs [now] to Ethiopia."
In the decades that followed the Scythians [Umman-Manda] descended from the steppes of Russia [possibly because of inhospital changes in weather] and headed toward Palestine driving out the Cimmerians before them. The defenses of the Assyrians withstood the onslought of the Cimmerians and here the ill fated history of Esarhaddon and Judith begins.
Sennacherib and Sethos
In conventional chronology Seti the Great lived in the latter part of the 14th century BC. The events which we now describe took place in the final years of the 8th century. Conventional history puts the grandson of Sethos 600 years before his grandfather, if we can prove our contention this confusion of history is not to be blamed on Herodotus. |
|
|
|
Sennacherib's Last Campaign The last campaign of Sennacherib was directed not only against Jerusalem, but also against Egypt and Ethiopia (Sudan)—an enterprising warrior, Tirhaka, who invaded Egypt from the Sudan, reinstated Sethos, and put the occupant of the throne of Egypt, underling of Sennacherib, to flight. When Sennacherib came to Palestine for the second time, Hezekiah refused to submit or to pay tribute. The Ethiopian king Tirhakah (Taharka) stood together with his Egyptian confederate, Sethos, at the border of Egypt, prepared to meet the threat. Sennacherib sent his messengers to Hezekiah from Lachish and once more from Libnah to demand submission; he also wrote him an ultimatum, and blasphemed the Hebrew God. Then in a single night the Assyrian host, about 185,000 warriors, perished, destroyed by some providential cause. Herodotus [1800] relates this event and gives a version he heard from the Egyptians when he visited their land two and a half centuries after it happened. When Sennacherib invaded Pelusium, the priest-king Sethos went with a weak army to defend the frontier. According to Herodotus in a single night hordes of field mice overran the Assyrian camp, devoured quivers, bowstrings and shield handles, and put the Assyrian army to flight. Another version was given by Berosus, the Chaldean priest of the third century before the present era. [1900] Sennacherib's army was annihilated on the night of March 23, -687. The account of this event is found in the apogryphical Book of Judith. It appears that Herodotus believed the Assyrian face-saving story of the demise of their general and his army. |
| Assyria | Israel - Land of 10 Tribes | Egypt |
| 1. |
Shalmaneser III (858-824 BC) The Black Obelisk |
Jehu of Israel (841-814 BC) He was probably of the house of Omri through a different lineage then Ahab. | Time of Akhnaton - El Amarna Period |
| 2. | Tiglath-Pileser III (Pul) (744-727 BC) |
Menahem (752-742 BC) Pekahiah (742-740 BC) Pekah (752-732 BC) Rival to Menahem Pharaoh So - 2. Kings 17:4. |
22nd Dynasty background Shoshenk III (?52 yrs) Shoshenk IV (?733-?721 BC) |
| 3. | Shalmaneser V (726-722 BC) | Hoshea (732-723 BC) | Shoshenk IV |
|
|
| Assyrian | Judah | Egypt |
| 4. | Sargon II/Sennacherib (723-705 BC) | Jehoahaz [Ahaz] (735-715 BC) | The end of the 22nd Dynasty and the time of the 3 Brothers. |
| 5. |
Sennacherib (705-681? BC) probably the same ruler under a different name |
Hezekiah (715-686 BC) Manasseh (696-642 BC) First as coruler. |
The Time of the Three Brothers The 25th Dynasty Shabataka (about 12 years 703-689 BC) Tirhaka (689-663 BC) |
| 6. | Esarhaddon/Holofernes (? - ? BC) | Manasseh (696-642 BC) | 25th Ethiopian Dynasty |
| 7. | Assurbanipal (?-656 BC) |
Manasseh (696-642 BC) Amon (642-640 BC) Josiah (640-609 BC) |
19th/26th Saitic Dynasty Ramses I(663 BC) Seti the Great (665-609 BC) |
|
|
| Assyria | Babylon | Egypt |
| 8. |
Assurubalit (627-about 613/612 BC) more |
Nabopolassar (?-607 BC) Also known as: Mursilis II who reigned for 22 years, 629-607 BC. Also known as Nabonidus, father of Nebuchadnezzar. | Time of Seti the Great |
|
The Change From Assyrian to Babylonian Rule We feel because of the erroneous Egyptian Chronology Herodotus has been blamed for writing inaccurate history when he writes about this period and in particular about Sethos. We feel that modern historians continue in their erroneous assumptions on the chronology of Egypt and that we have presented enough valid evidence to reconsider the stance taken by conventionally bound scholars. Assyrian Treasures Recently 4 or 5 tombs of an Assyrian king's royal consorts were found in Iraq at Nimrud stocked with presumably 9th-8th centuries BC treasures containing hundreds of pieces of enameled and engraved gold jewelry, gold bowls and flasks, and a rare electrum mirror. One tomb alone contained over 66 pounds of gold objects. Two of these tombs were found in the 1980's. Conventionally it is thought these treasures belonged to the consorts of a king like Ashur-Nasirpal II, but this king's connection to these tombs is not proven, they could also date to the time of a later king like Tiglath-Pileser or Shalmaneser IV or V. [2000] What is in the name `Assur'? From Assyria and many names of its kings the word `Assur' emerges as a constant reminder of the god of ancient Assyria. He is also shown in various objects of art among them the relief carvings from the fountain of the `Assur Temple' where he is shown wearing a fish scale overcoat representing probably the origin of a bishops miter. [2100] Some time ago a carved bone handle was found at `Abu al-Kharaz' in the Jordan River Valley. The handle features two sphinxes judged to be Assyrian because they face frontally rather than in profile. [2200]
Assyrian Field Altar
An Assyrian Cuneiform Letter Probable Assyrian Duplications Kanesh, in north-eastern Asia Minor, present-day Kultepe, is famous among 'Hittitologists' and Assyriologists alike for its ca. 1900 BC Assyrian 'merchant colony', identified as being contemporaneous with `Sargon of Akkad' (conv. ca. 2300 BC) through its numerous well-written documents in perfect Assyrian identical to that used in the mid-late 8th century BC Assyrian way of writing. But Sargon was then dated to the mid-late 8th century BC. Are we smelling a stratigraphical or historical duplication? Just by sheer coincidence, there was a Sargon (II) in the late 8th century BC .... and the interesting fact is, the captain of his bodyguard was one by the name of `Mannu-ki-Ashur'. Now this is a rare name - and as it so happens, the name `Mannu-ki-Ashur' appears also in the Kanesh texts of the time of `Sargon of Akkad'! [2500] We now continue the story with the time toward the end of the Assyrian might and what led to it. Here again we present material never found in conventional history books. We leave it up to the reader to judge its merits.
|
|
The Dating of Tiglat-Pileser I by D. M. I think that, with the fold of the Middle Assyrian king, Assuruballit (c. 1400 BC), to c. 850 BC, the middle kings following him, like Tiglat-Pileser I would need to come later than EA (probably there is archaeologoical evidence for a sequence as well). Thus I think our ID of Tiglat-Pileser I - approximately contemporary of Nebuchednezzar I (Sargon/Sennacherib) and Merodach-Baladin I (equals Merodach Baladin II) with Tiglat-Pileser III is pretty likely. And Emmet Sweeney has come to this same conclusion: "It has already been shown how Hittite art and architecture of Tiglath-Pileser III's reign is indistinguishable from that of the Hittite Empire. In particular, the Hittite prince Sulumeli, ruler of Malatya, who erected a classically Imperial Hittite palace, is named in the inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III. Now the same Hittite prince, named Allumari, occurs in the inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser I, who is generally dated to the 12th/13th century - near the end of the Hittite Empire. Scholars recorded the name Allumari of Malatya without comment, though they well understood that it could, or perhaps should, be read as Ulumeli, a name strangely reminiscent of Tiglath-Pileser III's Sulumeli. [2600]
Tiglath-Pileser I is generally dated a few decades after the fall of the Hittite Empire, yet one very important clue points to his direct involvement in its end. In one inscription the Assyrian king records the reception of tribute from Ini-Teshub, "king of Hatti". Now a Hittite prince of that name, a nephew of the last Hittite Great King Tudhkhaliash IV, is recorded at Boghazkoi; and scholars were surprised, indeed shocked, to find the same name recurring supposedly a century after the collapse of Hittite power.
But if we accept that Tiglath Pileser I and III were two different people, then we are involved in not one but numerous character duplications, or even triplications. Thus a Babylonian king named Marduk-apal-iddin (Merodach Baladan I) was active in opposing the Assyrians shortly after the collapse of Hittite power; but in all his activities he merely anticipated by six centuries the life of another Merodach Baladan (III), who opposed the Assyrians during and after the reign of Tiglath-Pileser III". [Emphasize ours]
I have not yet verified Sweeney's view that there were Ini-Teshub's contemporary with both Tiglat-Pileser I & III.
"At Ayelet Ha-Shahar, at the foot of the mound of Hazor, the fragmentary remains of an Assyrian residency have been revealed. Its details correspond remarkably to those of the Assyrian palaces in capital cities of the empire ... The Assyrian presence and influence are reflected in the pottery assemblage as well. ... a wealth of small finds may be related to Assyrian military or administrative presence, but they could also be prestige items that arrived by way of trade. They include a series of Assyrian cylinder seals and bullae. At Kafr Kana in the lower Galilee a magnificent Assyrian bronze vessel, resembling a goblet with a basket handle, was found. It has the shape of a ram's head, and an ornamental band near the rim contains a cultic scene in the royal Assyrian style. The vessel bears the name of its owner, Lizirishu." [2700]
Additional Information
In a room (EA) adjacent to the throne room of the NW Palace of Nineveh archaeologists discovered a cuneiform inscribed 1.3 meter tall stele with 154 lines of text in 1951. The floor pavements of the palace were made of burnt-brick and more than one layer was excavated. The earlier layer of Ashurnasirpal's [2800] palace was built upon by Shalmaneser III, whose workmen used a different size burnt-brick making it easier to distinguish his constructions. In the debry at the base of the stele were found finely carved ivories depicting Ashurnasirpal richly clothed and holding in his left hand the vulture bird-headed sickle of the god Ninurta and in his right he balances a cup on his fingertips. The occasion for the stele was the completion of the palace high up on the western ramparts of the akropolis, south of the Ziggurat and as near to the sacred precincts as it could be located, the completion of the entire town, temples, official buildings, houses, orchards, farms and gardens. The textual emphasis is said to be more directed toward the kings character as a high priest rather than on his kingship and successes as a military commander but not without a touch of arrogance. [2900]
[0100] According to dated information: "The German excavations at Assur appear to show that underneath the Sumerian stratum lies a Mitannian stratum (H). Above the Sumerian stratum comes a stratum (F) belonging to the period of the foundation of the great temple, and of the Kings Auspia (Auswa) and Kikia, whose names, however, are more probably Gutian than Mitannian." See A.H. Sayce, `Who were the Ammorites', Sep 1924, p. 74. |