|
Original Historical Documents |
|
Applied Petrography |
| Home | Addtopics | Submenu |
| El Amarna Tablets |
| EA Letters | Elemental Groupings | Chemical Analysis/Addit. Comments | Micro-Paleontology | Geological Environments Source Area |
| 1, 14 Written to Babylon | Esnah shale of Upper Egypt especially from the Esna-Idfu region |
| 162, 163 Written to Amurru, western Syria | Esnah shale of Upper Egypt especially from the Esna-Idfu region |
| 190, 367, 370 Written to rulers in Canaan | Esnah shale of Upper Egypt especially from the Esna-Idfu region |
| 163 | Typical example of Nile silt |
| 33-35, 37, 38 Written by Alashiya to Egypt | EA#33, 34, 38 consist of cream to buff color marl of good plasticity of the Pakhma formation found around Kouklia, Alassa and Kalavasos. | Contains marl with a few calcareos & volcanic rock fragments. EA 37 contains a more clay-rich matrix with abundant inclusions of weathered spilitic basalt, lime-stone, low-grade metamorphic [40] graywacke, quartz and flint. |
Basic volcanic and lesser sedimentary rocks. Composite characteristics: On a margin of an ophiolite complex where pillow lavas and dolerite are exposed, and bordering a sedimentary area containing carbonatic, argillaceous and siliceous rocks. Ex. a) the Troodos mountains, Cyprus - EA#37 & RS.L.1; b) the Mersin and c) Pozanti-Karsanti massif of NW Syria; d) Kizildag in Hatay in southern Turkey; e) the Baer-Bassif massif of NW Syria.
|
| |
| RS. L.1 Written by Alashiya to Ugarit | Reddish clay with poorly sorted, angular inclusions of dolerite, limestone, serpentine and flint. |
Basic volcanic and lesser sedimentary rocks. Composite characteristics: On a margin of an ophiolite complex where pillow lavas and dolerite are exposed, and bordering a sedimentary area containing carbonatic, argillaceous and siliceous rocks. Ex. a) the Troodos mountains, Cyprus - EA#37 & RS.L.1; b) the Mersin and c) Pozanti-Karsanti massif of NW Syria; d) Kizildag in Hatay in southern Turkey; e) the Baer-Bassif massif of NW Syria.
|
| |
| 60, 157 | Composed of diverse shale, ferruginous to argillaceous, and ferruginous ooliths, quartz sand and siltstone. Also contains tuff and weathered basalt fragments. | Mountains east of Tripoli, Lebanon. |
| 61, 62, 156 159 | Contain Neogene marl | Miocene or Pliocene era exposures east and south of Tripoli, Nahr el-Awdeh, Tell Arde (Ardata?). |
| 161, 164, 169-171 | Contains marl with foraminifers of Neogene recent age. Inclusions include primarily igneous, usually basalt and rarely dolerite, together with limestone and some quartz. | Inland part of the Akkar Plain (near Halba, Tell Arqa and Nahr el-Kebir) where marine deposits and volcanics appear jointly. |
| 59 Written by a citizen of Tunip to pharaoh. |
It is said that glauconite is formed by marine diagenesis of materials in shallow water at a time of slow sedimentation. It may appear as impurities in limestones and marls. When in high proportions they form `greensands', a term for the color. Glauconite is a potential source for dating by the Potassium-Argon method. In Syria glauconite is reportedly found in restricted areas: 1. in the Palmyrids depression, the southern slopes of the Halab uplift, the western slopes of Jebel Anseriyeh, and much more seldom on the eastern slopes of the Anti-Lebanon, however, the western slopes of the Anti-Lebanon would be closer to Baalbek/Dan/Tunip. Comment: Recently inscriptional evidence was found that Baalbek was Tunip. |
Under crossed polarizers, green bar size=0.2 mm. A) 1. glauconite pellets (green spheres) 2. chalk (white bodies) in foraminiferous marl. B) 1. Coralline alga (Amphiroa sp. algae) |
Said to belong to the Paleogene Age. Comments: While current information wants to locate Tunip at Tell Asharneh along the bank of the Orontes River, inside Syria, we believe that the Baaka Valley region, closer to Baalbek, also has soil which might contain glauconite since amber was found there in some quantities before the Arab uprising in Lebanon. The amber came from the resin of ancient buried trees. Glauconite or Potash is a Phyllosilicate of the Mica group and can be found in marine sediments close to a coast. Anciently the Baaka Valley may have been submerged for a time by the ocean since the Lebanese mountains are known to be rich sources of high quality fish and marine fossils. |
| 167 | Contains Coralline alga (Amphira sp. algae) |
| 259 | Contains partly chloritized spilite. |
| 249 | Contains Jordan sand, including basalt, chalk and quartz. |
| 165-167 | Contain coralline alga, Amphiroa sp. algae, flint, igneous minerals such as serpentine and olivine. | Contain Pleistocene to Holocene beach deposits, Senonian or Eocene flint. The only coastal place where these sediments occur together is the coastal area of the Akkar Plain. The mafic elements were probably transported there from the basalts of Nahr el-Kebir. Corresponds to the general setting of Tell Kazel. |
| Late Period Phoenician Hellenistic Wares (Based on Andrea M. Berlin, `From Monarchy to Markets: The Phoenicians in Hellenistic Palestine' in BASOR, May 1997, p. 75-88.) |
| Types of Wares Baggy Jars, table jugs, table amphorae, lagynos, juglets, amphoriskos, unguentariuns, etc. | Micro Petrography Thin sectioning: fine, dense clay matrix - sand, fragmentary and crushed gastropod shells, and occasionally clam shells. Indicates clay source was quite close to the coast. | Source Areas Southern Phoenicia, Cyprus, Oumm el-Amed (20 km south of Tyre - site of a single, simple farm on a small plain facing the sea). |
(Based on Gunnar Lehmann, `Trends in the Local Pottery Development of the Late Iron Age and Persian Period in Syria and Lebanon, ca. 700-300 BC' in BASOR, Aug 1998, p. 7-37.) "Too often the material record is related in a somewhat naive way to known historical events. On the contrary, one should expect to study the archaeological record independent of the historical record before connecting them, to find an absolut date for archaeological finds. All too often it is assumed that a historical change led to an immediate change in the material culture. However, an archaeological periodization system should be based only on an analysis of the material record. Furthermore, it should be related to the historical record only after it appears completely consistent internally." While the above statements have been voiced for quite some time, the research presented here at CIAS shows that interpreting occupation layers without written instructions is a hazardous task indeed, as far as historical interpretation is concerned, and has led to many erroneous conclusions. Comments: Here at CIAS we also believe that a whole new historical criteria needs to be considered which is consistent with ancient written sources like the Hebrew Bible. Archaeologists should very much acquaint themselves with the newest information on the evolutionary/creationist debate and basic philosopical recognition of interpretations on what `science' is and what it is not. Proven criteria like, `Normal, operational science' vs `Origins or historical science' needs to be understood and applied. Archaeologists need to get away from bankrupt Darwinian Evolutionary Thinking, the billions, hundreds and tens of thousands of years. Civilization is not that old as amply demostrated.[030] The baleful consequences of evolutionistic tendencies to connect man with some Neanderthal or even supposed older types of humanoids (s.t. monkey types) has wrecked havoc on interpretations in ancient history. It is time to face up to this situation and begin to correct the record. When dealing with the days of creation and the age of the earth, whom do you trust today - the latest secular findings that use assumptive dating methods or the more reliable method of consulting a history book provided by the Eyewitness account - God who inspired the Bible? Even among Christians there are various views on the age of the earth. So, how old is the earth? From the view of evolutionistic scholars, who seem to put their trust in the US Geologic Survey, the Earth is approximately 4.54 billion years old. From the view of biblical creationists like Martin Luther who said: "When Moses writes that God created heaven and earth and whatever is in them in six days, then let this period continue to have been six days, and do not venture to devise any comment according to which six days were one day. But, if you cannot understand how this could have been done in six days, then grant the Holy Spirit the honor of being more learned than you are." [Martin Luther, What Martin Luther Says: A Practical In-Home Anthology for the Active Christian. AiG, June 14, 2005]The Biblical data allow the addition of the genealogies and other information given in Scripture, which add up to the Earth being about 6,000 years old. It really comes down to the issue of biblical authority. Believing in a relatively "young earth" is a consequence of accepting the authority of the Word of God as an infallible revelation from our Creator. So, whom do you trust—The US Geologic Survey or the divine Eyewitness? Here at CIAS we shall point out these things as best and as often as we can. It will take time to make this into a more coherent account but with input we hope to progress in presenting a better history. Comment: But, you may bristle up and say, Dr. Martin Luther had no knowledge of science. How can you quote him? What did he know about anything? Like we said before, is it knowledge today's scientists teach or assumptions? Origins science which no one observed and where no one was present and which cannot be reproduced today, are pure belief and not science. Evolutionists are their own brand of `theologians', as such Dr. Martin Luther is very well qualified to speak up on the subject. We trust the Eyewitness account. Additional Sources for Information A map of northern Israel survey areas includes: Tel Dan, Abel Abel Bet Ma`acah, Te'o (Teo), Kinnerot, Reqet (Khirbet el-Quneitra), Bet Yerah, Qishyon, Qashish, Ta'anakh, Yoqne'am, Yaqush; All located between Bet Shean, the Med. Sea and the Hula Valley. The southern Lebanese Beqa, the Golan plateau, Galilee, the Jezreel Valley and Tel Taanakh is the source of much EB II and III metallic ware, pottery ware that sounds metallic when lightly struck. [100] The article describes the petrography of ware from Tel Dan and Tel Teo. EB IV Petrographic Differences from the following sources: 1) Har Dimon located in the Negeb SE of Beth Pelet and W of the Dead Sea. Described as `Lower Cretaceous group, Ferruginous shales with Nubian sandstone quartz grains.; 2) Nahal Refaim not far from Bethelem, south of Jerusalem; described as Moza clay and dolomitic sand group.; 3) Mashabei Sadeh, located W of Har Dimon; described as Arkose group, Granitic arkose; 4) Beer Resisim (nearby); described as Mollusk fossil shell fragments and from the same location 5) a) Loess and calcareous/ quartz sand group. b) Nile silt group.[200] |
|
|
| Conglomerate | When coarse gravel is lithified within a matrix. | Coarse gravel | There are clast-supported and matrix-supported coarse gravels. | Clast-gravel | When rocks touch each other and the voids are filled with matrix. |
| Matrix-gravel | The rocks are almost entirely surrounded by matrix. | Mass-wasting | As in the flow of debris, a landslide or a slump. | littoral | along beaches |
| "Percussion marks appear limited to relatively smooth clasts of hard and vitreous, cryptocrystalline or microcrystalline lithologies (i.e. hard, brittle, strong, homogeneous materials) that collide at relative velocities of at least several meters per second. Percussion marks alone are indicative of a highly energetic and erosive environment." [300] |
Like the Sabbath, the week originated at creation, and it has been preserved and brought down to us through Bible history. God Himself measured off the first week as a sample for successive weeks to the close of time. Like every other, it consisted of seven literal days. Six days were employed in the work of creation; upon the seventh, God rested, and He then blessed this day and set it apart as a day of rest for man. In the law given from Sinai, God recognized the week, and the facts upon which it is based. After giving the command, "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy," and specifying what shall be done on the six days, and what shall not be done on the seventh, He states the reason for thus observing the week, by pointing back to His own example:"For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it." Exodus 20:8-11. This reason appears beautiful and forcible when we understand the days of creation to be literal. The first six days of each week are given to man for labor, because God employed the same period of the first week in the work of creation. On the seventh day man is to refrain from labor, in commemoration of the Creator's rest. But the assumption that the events of the first week required thousands upon thousands of years, strikes directly at the foundation of the fourth commandment. It represents the Creator as commanding men to observe the week of literal days in commemoration of vast, indefinite periods. This is unlike His method of dealing with His creatures. It makes indefinite and obscure that which He has made very plain. It is infidelity in its most insidious and hence most dangerous form; its real character is so disguised that it is held and taught by many who profess to believe the Bible. "By the word of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth." "For He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast." Psalm 33:6, 9. The Bible recognizes no long ages in which the earth was slowly evolved from chaos. Of each successive day of creation, the sacred record declares that it consisted of the evening and the morning, like all other days that have followed. At the close of each day is given the result of the Creator's work. The statement is made at the close of the first week's record, "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created." Genesis 2:4. But this does not convey the idea that the days of creation were other than literal days. Each day was called a generation, because that in it God generated, or produced, some new portion of His work. Geologists claim to find evidence from the earth itself that it is very much older than the Mosaic record teaches. Bones of men and animals, as well as instruments of warfare, petrified trees, et cetera, much larger than any that now exist, or that have existed for thousands of years, have been discovered, and from this it is inferred that the earth was populated long before the time brought to view in the record of creation, and by a race of beings vastly superior in size to any men now living. Such reasoning has led many professed Bible believers to adopt the position that the days of creation were vast, indefinite periods. But apart from Bible history, geology can prove nothing. Those who reason so confidently upon its discoveries have no adequate conception of the size of men, animals, and trees before the Flood, or of the great changes which then took place. Relics found in the earth do give evidence of conditions differing in many respects from the present, but the time when these conditions existed can be learned only from the Inspired Record. In the history of the Flood, inspiration has explained that which geology alone could never fathom. In the days of Noah, men, animals, and trees, many times larger than now exist, were buried, and thus preserved as an evidence to later generations that the antediluvians perished by a flood. God designed that the discovery of these things should establish faith in inspired history; but men, with their vain reasoning, fall into the same error as did the people before the Flood--the things which God gave them as a benefit, they turn into a curse by making a wrong use of them. It is one of Satan's devices to lead the people to accept the fables of infidelity; for he can thus obscure the law of God, in itself very plain, and embolden men to rebel against the divine government. His efforts are especially directed against the fourth commandment, because it so clearly points to the living God, the Maker of the heavens and the earth. There is a constant effort made to explain the work of creation as the result of natural causes; and human reasoning is accepted even by professed Christians, in opposition to plain Scripture facts. There are many who oppose the investigation of the prophecies, especially those of Daniel and the Revelation, declaring them to be so obscure that we cannot understand them; yet these very persons eagerly receive the suppositions of geologists, in contradiction of the Mosaic record. But if that which God has revealed is so difficult to understand, how inconsistent it is to accept mere suppositions in regard to that which He has not revealed! "The secret things belong unto the Lord our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children forever." Deuteronomy 29:29. Just how God accomplished the work of creation He has never revealed to men; human science cannot search out the secrets of the Most High. His creative power is as incomprehensible as His existence. God has permitted a flood of light to be poured upon the world in both science and art; but when professedly scientific men treat upon these subjects from a merely human point of view, they will assuredly come to wrong conclusions. It may be innocent to speculate beyond what God's word has revealed, if our theories do not contradict facts found in the Scriptures; but those who leave the word of God, and seek to account for His created works upon scientific principles, are drifting without chart or compass upon an unknown ocean. The greatest minds, if not guided by the word of God in their research, become bewildered in their attempts to trace the relations of science and revelation. Because the Creator and His works are so far beyond their comprehension that they are unable to explain them by natural laws, they regard Bible history as unreliable. Those who doubt the reliability of the records of the Old and New Testaments, will be led to go a step further, and doubt the existence of God; and then, having lost their anchor, they are left to beat about upon the rocks of infidelity. These persons have lost the simplicity of faith. There should be a settled belief in the divine authority of God's Holy Word. The Bible is not to be tested by men's ideas of science. Human knowledge is an unreliable guide. Skeptics who read the Bible for the sake of caviling, may, through an imperfect comprehension of either science or revelation, claim to find contradictions between them; but rightly understood, they are in perfect harmony. Moses wrote under the guidance of the Spirit of God, and a correct theory of geology will never claim discoveries that cannot be reconciled with his statements. All truth, whether in nature or in revelation, is consistent with itself in all its manifestations. In the word of God many queries are raised that the most profound scholars can never answer. Attention is called to these subjects to show us how much there is, even among the common things of everyday life, that finite minds, with all their boasted wisdom, can never fully understand. Yet men of science think that they can comprehend the wisdom of God, that which He has done or can do. The idea largely prevails that He is restricted by His own laws. Men either deny or ignore His existence, or think to explain everything, even the operation of His Spirit upon the human heart; and they no longer reverence His name or fear His power. They do not believe in the supernatural, not understanding God's laws or His infinite power to work His will through them. As commonly used, the term "laws of nature" comprises what men have been able to discover with regard to the laws that govern the physical world; but how limited is their knowledge, and how vast the field in which the Creator can work in harmony with His own laws and yet wholly beyond the comprehension of finite beings! Many teach that matter possesses vital power--that certain properties are imparted to matter, and it is then left to act through its own inherent energy; and that the operations of nature are conducted in harmony with fixed laws, with which God Himself cannot interfere. This is false science, and is not sustained by the word of God. Nature is the servant of her Creator. God does not annul His laws or work contrary to them, but He is continually using them as His instruments. Nature testifies of an intelligence, a presence, an active energy, that works in and through her laws. There is in nature the continual working of the Father and the Son. Christ says, "My Father worketh hitherto, and I work." John 5:17. The Levites, in their hymn recorded by Nehemiah, sang, "Thou, even Thou, art Lord alone; Thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things therein, . . . and Thou preservest them all." Nehemiah 9:6. As regards this world, God's work of creation is completed. For "the works were finished from the foundation of the world." Hebrews 4:3. But His energy is still exerted in upholding the objects of His creation. It is not because the mechanism that has once been set in motion continues to act by its own inherent energy that the pulse beats and breath follows breath; but every breath, every pulsation of the heart, is an evidence of the all-pervading care of Him in whom "we live, and move, and have our being." Acts 17:28. It is not because of inherent power that year by year the earth produces her bounties and continues her motion around the sun. The hand of God guides the planets and keeps them in position in their orderly march through the heavens. He "bringeth out their host by number: He calleth them all by names by the greatness of His might, for that He is strong in power; not one faileth." Isaiah 40:26. It is through His power that vegetation flourishes, that the leaves appear and the flowers bloom. He "maketh grass to grow upon the mountains" (Psalm 147:8), and by Him the valleys are made fruitful. "All the beasts of the forest . . . seek their meat from God," and every living creature, from the smallest insect up to man, is daily dependent upon His providential care. In the beautiful words of the psalmist, "These wait all upon Thee. . . . That Thou givest them they gather: Thou openest Thine hand, they are filled with good." Psalm 104:20, 21, 27, 28. His word controls the elements; He covers the heavens with clouds and prepares rain for the earth. "He giveth snow like wool: He scattereth the hoarfrost like ashes." Psalm 147:16. "When He uttereth His voice, there is a multitude of waters in the heavens, and He causeth the vapors to ascend from the ends of the earth; He maketh lightnings with rain, and bringeth forth the wind out of His treasuries." Jeremiah 10:13. God is the foundation of everything. All true science is in harmony with His works; all true education leads to obedience to His government. Science opens new wonders to our view; she soars high, and explores new depths; but she brings nothing from her research that conflicts with divine revelation. Ignorance may seek to support false views of God by appeals to science, but the book of nature and the written word shed light upon each other. We are thus led to adore the Creator and to have an intelligent trust in His word. No finite mind can fully comprehend the existence, the power, the wisdom, or the works of the Infinite One. Says the sacred writer: "Canst thou by searching find out God? canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection? It is as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know? The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea." Job 11:7-9. The mightiest intellects of earth cannot comprehend God. Men may be ever searching, ever learning, and still there is an infinity beyond.
Yet the works of creation testify of God's power and greatness. "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth His handiwork." Psalm 19:1. Those who take the written word as their counselor will find in science an aid to understand God. "The invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead." Romans 1:20. Notes & References |
|
[0010] Yuval Goren, Israel Finkelstein & Nadav Na'aman, `The Expansion of the Kingdom of Amurru According to the Petrographic Investigation of the Amarna Tablets' in BASOR, Feb 2003, No. 329, p. 1-11. [0020] Photomicrographs from Shiqmim and Pseira, Cyprus compared in BA, Vol. 51, p. 198f. [0030] See Carl Wieland, `Radiometric Breakthroughs', http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/radiometric.asp, or/and Geophysics and 6 Days. [040] For interesting info on metamorphic rocks called `eclogite' click here. [100] Raphael Greenberg, A Third Millenium Levantine Pottery Production Center in BASOR, Feb 1996, p. 5-24. [200] Yuval Goren, The Southern Levant in the EB IV Age in BASOR, Aug 1996, p. 33-72. [300] Michael J. Oard & Peter Klevberg, Deposits Remaining from the Genesis Flood: Rim Gravels in Arizona in Creation Research Society Quarterly (CRSQ), Vol. 42, June 2005, p. 1-(6,7)-17. |